AI's Influence on "Word of the Year" Choices: A Reflection of Asia's Landscape
AI's influence in Asia reflected in 2023's "word of the year" choices by major dictionaries,Cambridge's "hallucinate" and Merriam-Webster's "authentic" spark discussions on reality and legitimacy,Oxford's "prompt" highlights the evolving human-AI interaction, with "rizz" acknowledging AI's lack of human charm
AI's Growing Influence in Asia Mirrored in "Word of the Year" Choices
From ChatGPT's convincing narratives to AI-generated art, 2023's "word of the year" choices by major dictionaries reflect the growing influence and complexities of artificial intelligence.
From ChatGPT's convincing narratives to AI-generated art, the growing influence of artificial intelligence and AGI in Asia is evident in the 2023 "word of the year" selections by major dictionaries. These choices reflect the complexities and implications of AI's rapid development and integration into society. For a deeper dive into the region's AI landscape, read about APAC AI in 2026: 4 Trends You Need To Know.
Redefining Reality and Authenticity
Enjoying this? Get more in your inbox.
Weekly AI news & insights from Asia.
Merriam-Webster's "authentic" mirrors this concern, echoing societal anxieties about real vs. fake. This trend not only applies to consumerism but also extends to questioning the very legitimacy of trends and objects themselves.
Cambridge's choice of "hallucinate" captures the essence of AI's ability to generate compelling yet fabricated outputs, blurring the lines between reality and AI-generated content. This phenomenon extends beyond text, as generative AI's imagery and audio creations raise exciting possibilities and concerns about deepfakes and digital age authenticity. The ability of AI to create hyper-realistic visuals is also explored in articles like Spotting AI Video: The #1 Clue.
Merriam-Webster's "authentic" resonates with these concerns, reflecting societal anxieties about discerning real from fake. This trend extends beyond consumerism, questioning the legitimacy of trends and objects themselves.
Human Interaction and Control in the AI Era
Oxford's runner-up, "prompt," introduces a human element, showcasing the shift from noun to verb as we interact with AI. This linguistic evolution prompts us to consider who controls whom in this dynamic relationship. The rise of AI-powered tools like ChatGPT's 'Buy It' Button Is Quietly Rewriting Online Shopping further illustrates this evolving interaction.
Meanwhile, Oxford's top pick, "rizz," humorously acknowledges AI's lack of playful charisma, highlighting AI's increasing presence in our vocabulary, even as technical terms remain less readily adopted.
Provocative Question: As AI and AGI continue to reshape our reality, creativity, and human interaction in Asia, how can we foster a future that encourages meaningful partnerships between humans and AI? This question is particularly pertinent given the ethical considerations surrounding AI development, as highlighted in discussions by institutions like the World Economic Forum on AI governance.









Latest Comments (4)
Interesting take on AI and our annual word choices. I wonder though, is “authenticity” truly about chasing pixels, or more about our own shifting perceptions of what's real in this new landscape? Maybe it's less about AI fooling us, and more about us adjusting our own filters, lah.
This piece on the "Word of the Year" choices really got me thinking, even now, a little while after the initial buzz. It's fascinating how "hallucinated" and "authenticity" were such big contenders, perfectly capturing the push and pull with AI's impact on our daily lives, particularly over here. It makes me wonder, given the article's point about Asia's landscape and the global spread of these tech narratives – are we seeing a divergence in how different regions are *defining* authenticity in this AI-saturated world? Like, could "authenticity" mean something subtly different in, say, Singapore versus San Francisco, or are we all pretty much wrestling with the same core anxieties?
"Authenticity" from digital pixels? Hmm, sounds a bit like we're chasing our own tails, non? The human spark still has to win.
"Authenticity" amidst AI narratives? Colour me slightly dubious. "Rizz" might be a flash in the pan, but genuine human connection feels further off.
Leave a Comment