AI Content: A Ticking Time Bomb for CMOs?
CMOs relying heavily on AI-generated content for SEO may face traffic drops and ranking penalties. Google's policy penalises content created solely for manipulating rankings, regardless of AI or human creation. AI should augment, not replace, human creativity and SEO strategy.
The LinkedIn Debate: AI Content and SEO
Eli Schwartz, author of "Product-Led SEO," sparked a heated debate on LinkedIn. He warned about Chief Marketing Officers (CMOs) who believe AI-written content is a foolproof SEO strategy. Eli predicted a rude awakening for these CMOs once their strategies fail. For more on how AI is impacting businesses, read about executives treading carefully on generative AI adoption.
"Too many CMOs think that AI-written content is an SEO strategy that will replace actual SEO. This mistake is going to lead to an explosion in demand for SEO strategists to help them fix their traffic when they find out they might have been wrong." - Eli Schwartz
"Too many CMOs think that AI-written content is an SEO strategy that will replace actual SEO. This mistake is going to lead to an an explosion in demand for SEO strategists to help them fix their traffic when they find out they might have been wrong." - Eli Schwartz
The discussion, with 54 comments, saw overwhelming agreement from marketers. However, one dissenting voice stood out.
Google's Stance on AI-Generated Content
Google's policy on AI content is clear. Their March 2024 update emphasised that using automation, including AI, to manipulate rankings is considered spam. The key point is the intent behind the content creation. If it's solely to boost rankings, penalties may apply. This aligns with broader discussions on the ethical implications of AI, such as ProSocial AI.
"Our new policy is meant to help people focus more clearly on the idea that producing content at scale is abusive if done for the purpose of manipulating search rankings and that this applies whether automation or humans are involved." - Google
Enjoying this? Get more in your inbox.
Weekly AI news & insights from Asia.
"Our new policy is meant to help people focus more clearly on the idea that producing content at scale is abusive if done for the purpose of manipulating search rankings and that this applies whether automation or humans are involved." - Google
The Risks of Over-Reliance on AI Content
CMOs who rely too heavily on AI content may face several risks:
Traffic Drops: Google may penalise sites that publish low-quality, AI-generated content created solely for rankings. Reputation Damage: Poorly crafted AI content can harm a brand's image. Lack of Creativity: Over-reliance on AI can stifle human creativity and innovation.
AI as a Tool, Not a Crutch
AI should augment, not replace, human effort. Here's how to use AI responsibly:
Content Ideation: Use AI to generate topic ideas, but ensure human oversight and creativity. Drafting: AI can create initial drafts, but human editors should refine and improve them. For a practical guide, explore how to teach ChatGPT your writing style. Optimisation: AI can suggest keywords and meta tags, but humans should ensure they're used naturally.
The Human Touch in SEO
SEO is not just about keywords and rankings. It's about understanding user intent, creating valuable content, and building relationships. AI can't replicate these human aspects. A strong human element is essential for successful SEO, especially with the rise of Google AI Overviews (with ads!) coming to APAC.
The Future of AI in Content Creation
AI will undoubtedly play a significant role in content creation. However, it's crucial to strike a balance between AI efficiency and human creativity. A study by the Pew Research Center highlights public attitudes towards AI in daily life, suggesting a nuanced view on its integration into creative fields Pew Research Center.
Comment and Share:
Have you seen examples of AI-generated content gone wrong? How do you think AI will shape the future of content creation? Share your thoughts and experiences below. Don't forget to Subscribe to our newsletter for updates on AI and AGI.











Latest Comments (3)
This was a thought-provoking read, really makes you wonder about the long game here. While I appreciate the points on human oversight being crucial, I'm a bit dubious about how "easy" it'll be for CMOs to continually enforce that. In the race for clicks and visibility, especially for smaller outfits, it's a slippery slope innit? The temptation to just blast out AI-generated stuff without proper review might prove too strong for many, despite Google's warnings. We'll see how this plays out in the real world, for sure.
Gosh, just seeing this article now, really makes you think! With Google's ever changing algorithms, how realistic is it for CMOs to truly maintain "human oversight" at scale without totally blowing their content budget? Especially in this competitive digital landscape, you know.
This is spot on. I've been wrestling with this exact issue at work, proper mind-bender trying to balance efficiency with quality. Definitely gonna bookmark this and dig into it later.
Leave a Comment