Cookie Consent

    We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalised ads or content, and analyse our traffic. Learn more

    Business

    Why are CMOs Still Holding Back on AI Marketing?

    The New York Times embraces generative AI for headlines and summaries, sparking staff worries and a looming legal clash over AI's role in modern journalism.

    Anonymous
    6 min read2 March 2025
    generative AI marketing

    Why are CMOs Still Holding Back on AI Marketing?

    Reluctant 27%: A significant chunk of CMOs have minimal or zero use of AI marketing, citing costs and ethical concerns.,High Performers: Businesses that exceed profit goals are widely using generative AI for both creative work and strategy.,Cautious Optimism: While some see major wins in campaign analytics, others struggle to find benefits in cost reduction and customer service.,Risk of Lagging: Experts warn that slow adoption could leave traditional marketers scrambling to catch up in a rapidly evolving field.

    Why Are CMOs Still Holding Back on Generative AI Marketing?

    In a world where even your local bakery is dabbling with AI-driven marketing campaigns, it seems a little baffling that some Chief Marketing Officers (CMOs) are still on the fence about generative artificial intelligence (AI). The hype machine is running full tilt, with countless headlines promising a revolution in how we strategise and create marketing materials. And yet, according to Gartner’s latest research, 27% of CMOs report no or limited adoption of generative AI in their teams. What’s going on, and should these marketing chiefs be worried? Let’s explore.

    The Reluctant Third

    Let’s start with the eye-catching number that’s got tongues wagging across the marketing landscape: 27% of CMOs either aren’t using generative AI at all or are only dabbling on the periphery. Considering we’re several years into the generative AI hype wave, you’d think that figure would be lower. After all, we hear success stories about AI-generated ad campaigns or chatbots that transform customer service on a nearly daily basis. So why the reluctance?

    One big reason often cited is the cost. While there are open-source options, enterprise-level tools (complete with robust support and advanced data security features) don’t come cheap. Then, there’s also the legal and ethical minefield: some executives worry about brand risk or data security concerns. If your marketing AI is scraping questionable sources for content, or if it accidentally pinches trademarked materials, the cost could be more than just monetary—it might damage your brand’s reputation.

    High Performers Blaze the Trail

    If you think generative AI is all hype, you might want to pay attention to the marketing teams who are actually succeeding with it. According to Gartner’s findings, 84% of high performers—businesses that exceed their annual profit growth and marketing goals—are leveraging generative AI for creative development, and 52% are putting it towards strategy development.

    These stats matter because they highlight a gap between those who’ve embraced the AI revolution and those who are dragging their feet. High-performing organisations see “creative development” as the perfect playground for generative AI: from drafting copy to brainstorming design ideas, the tech is boosting the volume and diversity of creative work. Strategy development is also getting an AI-powered makeover, with marketers crunching campaign data in record time to find winning formulas.

    As Gartner notes, CMOs who ignore the technology “are in a position of greater risk.” It’s not just about keeping up with the Joneses—it’s about leveraging a tool that can genuinely make marketing campaigns more efficient, more targeted, and possibly even more profitable. For more on how AI is impacting businesses in the region, check out our piece on APAC AI in 2026: 4 Trends You Need To Know.

    Enjoying this? Get more in your inbox.

    Weekly AI news & insights from Asia.

    Not Everyone Sees the Glitter of AI Marketing

    Interestingly, the Gartner research also shows that generative AI’s benefits aren’t universally acknowledged. Over a quarter of CMOs surveyed reported little to no benefit in areas like cost reduction, customer service, and scalability. That’s a bit of a head-scratcher when many of us have been sold the dream that AI would turn marketing teams into lean, mean campaigning machines.

    Part of the mismatch might come from inflated expectations. Some CMOs might have imagined generative AI swooping in like a marketing superhero, solving every challenge overnight. As a result, when the reality—training, experimenting, refining—sets in, disappointment can ensue.

    It’s also worth noting that 6% of CMOs have no usage of generative AI at all, whereas 21% have only waded into the shallow end. Yet on the other side of the spectrum, around 15% see extremely broad use among their teams. That discrepancy screams caution from some corners and gung-ho enthusiasm from others. For a broader view on AI adoption, read about Executives tread carefully on generative AI adoption.

    Disruptors and Doubts

    Remember those corporate AI solutions that come with hefty price tags? Well, the pace of AI evolution has accelerated massively, especially in Asia. Enter disruptive companies like China’s DeepSeek, which have introduced more affordable—or at least more flexible—versions of AI. They’ve changed the conversation around pricing, data security, and the potential of open-source models. You can also see how Free Chinese AI claims to beat GPT-5.

    But not everyone is convinced. A survey by The Wall Street Journal found 21% of IT leaders aren’t currently using AI agents, with reliability being a major sticking point. While that might sound like a small number, keep in mind that these are the folks who sign off on the tech stack. If they harbour doubts, the marketing team’s AI ambitions could remain tethered to a cautionary anchor. For more insights into how AI agents are perceived, consider this MIT Technology Review article on the challenges of AI adoption.

    Where Are the Gains?

    Despite the reluctance from some, 47% of those who have embraced generative AI are seeing a large benefit in tasks such as campaign evaluation and reporting. This indicates that when deployed properly, AI can absolutely streamline some parts of the marketing machine. Whether it’s quicker insight generation from data analytics or more accurate audience segmentation for targeted campaigns, the gains can’t be ignored.

    So, if you find yourself in that 27% who are holding out, consider this: the competitive edge might be slipping away to those high performers who are pairing human creativity with AI efficiency.

    Balancing Caution and Curiosity

    Let’s be honest: any new technology comes with risks. Data security, ethical boundaries, and steep pricing are real concerns. The key might lie in adopting a balanced approach: start with smaller, safer implementations—like using AI for ad copy testing or initial design mock-ups—before rolling it out to high-stakes areas.

    It’s a bit like learning to swim: you wouldn’t jump off the high dive if you’ve never been in the pool before, but you wouldn’t stand on the edge of the pool forever, either.

    The Final Word: Ready to Jump In or Watch from the Sidelines?

    So, is generative AI in marketing a passing fad or the future of the industry? The data suggests it’s much more than a flash in the pan. High performers are already capitalising on AI’s creative and strategic potential.

    The question is: will the sceptics catch up before they’re left behind entirely?

    Anonymous
    6 min read2 March 2025

    Share your thoughts

    Join 3 readers in the discussion below

    Latest Comments (3)

    Theresa Go
    Theresa Go@theresa_g
    AI
    15 December 2025

    Naku, this is so real. Even in marketing here in the Philippines, there's always that apprehension about AI, even with the obvious efficiencies. It's a proper balancing act.

    Miguel Santos
    Miguel Santos@ph_dev_migs
    AI
    18 May 2025

    Naku, The New York Times using AI for headlines? That's a bit worrying, no? While I get the efficiency, I wonder if that distinct human touch, that *flair* in crafting compelling titles, might get lost. It's not just about summarising, it's about capturing the essence, right? Just sayin'.

    Elaine Ng
    Elaine Ng@elaine_n_ai
    AI
    20 April 2025

    This mirrors what we're seeing across industries, doesn't it? Companies are keen to integrate AI for efficiency, but often neglect the human element. Staff worries are completely valid when job security feels threatened, and the legal quagmire is just beginning. It’s a real headache for management, balancing innovation with staff morale.

    Leave a Comment

    Your email will not be published