TL;DR:
- AI and AGI are revolutionising the art scene in Southeast Asia, enabling artists to explore new mediums and reimagine their cultural heritage.
- AI-powered tools like Stable Diffusion and Midjourney are helping artists create photo-realistic images and videos, pushing the boundaries of creativity.
- AI art generation raises questions about copyright, authorship, and originality, with legal uncertainties surrounding the use of these technologies.
The AI Art Revolution in Southeast Asia
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) are transforming the artistic landscape in Southeast Asia. These technologies are providing artists with new mediums to express their ideas and reimagine their country’s history. One such artist is Patrick Cabral, a multi-disciplinary artist from the Philippines who uses AI software like Stable Diffusion and Midjourney to create photo-realistic images of pre-colonial Philippines in a contemporary setting.
AI’s Role in Reimagining Cultural Heritage
For Cabral, AI tools offer a unique opportunity to explore the question of how architecture and fashion would have evolved if the Philippines weren’t colonised. However, he faced cultural challenges while using these programmes. AI algorithms often failed to understand regional concepts, resulting in inaccurate depictions of Southeast Asian clothes, people, or architecture. To overcome this, Cabral created lines of code to train his AI to recreate Filipino motifs and landscapes.
AI and the Mainstream Art Scene
AI’s influence extends beyond individual artists. Galleries in the region are also capitalising on AI’s increasing accessibility. For instance, the Singapore Art Museum launched ‘Proof of Personhood,’ an exhibition exploring the interplay between art, identity, and AI. This exhibition sparked conversations about the sentience of AI and its role in art among visitors of all ages.
The Dark Side of AI Art
Despite the benefits, concerns about copyright and human replacement have caused some to question if the AI race is accelerating too fast. The ease with which AI can replicate artists’ styles poses a threat to originality in the market. In 2023, a group of USA-based artists launched the first class action lawsuit against several AI generators, including Midjourney, DeviantArt, and Stability AI, accusing the companies of copyright infringement.
The Legal Grey Area
The question of who owns the copyright of AI-generated art remains a legally grey area. Ronald Wong, Deputy Managing Director at Singaporean law firm Covenant Chambers, notes that while there is a requirement for human authorship under the Singapore Copyright Act, who that human author is remains unclear. This could be intentional, as the review committee deliberately left open the question of computer-generated work and copyright ownership.
AI in Art: A Double-Edged Sword
While AI and AGI are revolutionising the art scene in Southeast Asia, they also pose legal and ethical challenges. As these technologies continue to evolve, it is crucial to address these concerns and ensure that they are used responsibly and ethically.
What do you think about the role of AI and AGI in art? Do you believe these technologies are a boon or a bane for the artistic community? Share your thoughts in the comments below and don’t forget to subscribe for updates on AI and AGI developments.
You may also like:
