Life
OpenAI’s Bold Venture: Crafting the Moral Compass of AI
OpenAI funds moral AI research at Duke University to align AI systems with human ethical considerations.
Published
5 months agoon
By
AIinAsia
TL;DR
- OpenAI funds a $1 million, three-year research project at Duke University to develop algorithms that predict human moral judgements.
- The project aims to align AI systems with human ethical considerations, focusing on medical ethics, legal decisions, and business conflicts.
- Technical limitations, such as algorithmic complexity and data biases, pose significant challenges to creating moral AI.
The quest to imbue machines with a moral AI compass is gaining momentum.
OpenAI, a leading AI research organisation, has taken a significant step in this direction by funding a $1 million, three-year research project at Duke University. Led by practical ethics professor Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, this initiative aims to develop algorithms capable of predicting human moral judgements in complex scenarios.
As AI continues to permeate various aspects of our lives, the need for ethically aware systems has never been more pressing.
The AI Morality Project at Duke University
The AI Morality Project at Duke University, funded by OpenAI, is a groundbreaking initiative focused on aligning AI systems with human ethical considerations. This three-year research project, led by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, aims to create algorithms that can predict human moral judgements in intricate situations such as medical ethics, legal decisions, and business conflicts.
“The project’s outcomes could potentially influence the development of more ethically aware AI systems in various fields, including healthcare, law, and business.”
While specific details about the research remain undisclosed, the project is part of a larger $1 million grant awarded to Duke professors studying “making moral AI.” The research is set to conclude in 2025 and forms part of OpenAI’s broader efforts to ensure that AI systems are ethically aligned with human values.
Research Objectives and Challenges
The OpenAI-funded research at Duke University aims to develop algorithms capable of predicting human moral judgements, addressing the complex challenge of aligning AI decision-making with human ethical considerations. This ambitious project faces several key objectives and challenges:
- Developing a robust framework for AI to understand and interpret diverse moral scenarios: AI systems need to comprehend and analyse various ethical situations to make informed decisions.
- Addressing potential biases in ethical decision-making algorithms: Ensuring that AI systems are free from biases is crucial for fair and just decision-making.
- Ensuring the AI can adapt to evolving societal norms and cultural differences in moral judgements: AI systems must be flexible enough to adapt to changing societal norms and cultural variations.
- Balancing the need for consistent ethical reasoning with the flexibility to handle nuanced situations: AI must strike a balance between consistent ethical reasoning and the ability to handle complex, nuanced scenarios.
While the specific methodologies remain undisclosed, the research likely involves analysing large datasets of human moral judgements to identify patterns and principles that can be translated into algorithmic form. The project’s success could have far-reaching implications for AI applications in fields such as healthcare, law, and business, where ethical decision-making is crucial.
Technical Limitations of Moral AI
While the pursuit of moral AI is ambitious, it faces significant technical limitations that challenge its implementation and effectiveness:
- Algorithmic complexity: Developing algorithms capable of accurately predicting human moral judgments across diverse scenarios is extremely challenging, given the nuanced and context-dependent nature of ethical decision-making.
- Data limitations: The quality and quantity of training data available for moral judgments may be insufficient or biased, potentially leading to skewed or inconsistent ethical predictions.
- Interpretability issues: As AI systems become more complex, understanding and explaining their moral reasoning processes becomes increasingly difficult, raising concerns about transparency and accountability in ethical decision-making.
These technical hurdles underscore the complexity of creating AI systems that can reliably navigate the intricacies of human morality, highlighting the need for continued research and innovation in this field.
Ethical AI Foundations
AI ethics draws heavily from philosophical traditions, particularly moral philosophy and ethics. The field grapples with fundamental questions about the nature of intelligence, consciousness, and moral agency. Key philosophical considerations in AI ethics include:
- Moral status: Determining whether AI systems can possess moral worth or be considered moral patients.
- Ethical frameworks: Applying and adapting existing philosophical approaches like utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics to AI decision-making.
- Human-AI interaction: Exploring the ethical implications of AI’s increasing role in society and its potential impact on human autonomy and dignity.
- Transparency and explainability: Addressing the philosophical challenges of creating AI systems whose decision-making processes are comprehensible to humans.
These philosophical enquiries form the foundation for developing ethical guidelines and principles in AI development, aiming to ensure that AI systems align with human values and promote societal well-being.
Final Thoughts: The Path Forward
The AI Morality Project at Duke University, funded by OpenAI, represents a significant step towards creating ethically aware AI systems. While the project faces numerous challenges, its potential to influence the development of moral AI in various fields is immense. As AI continues to integrate into our daily lives, ensuring that these systems are aligned with human ethical considerations is crucial for a harmonious and just future.
Join the Conversation:
What are your thoughts on the future of moral AI? How do you envisage AI systems making ethical decisions in complex scenarios? Share your insights and experiences with AI technologies in the comments below.
Don’t forget to subscribe for updates on AI and AGI developments here. Let’s keep the conversation going and build a community of tech enthusiasts passionate about the future of AI!
You may also like:
- Mastering AI Ethics: Your Guide to Responsible Innovation
- How Digital Agents Will Transform the Future of Work
- How AI is Becoming More Reliable and Transparent
- Or try Google Gemini for free by tapping here.
Author
Discover more from AIinASIA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
You may like
-
Too Nice for Comfort? Why OpenAI Rolled Back GPT-4o’s Sycophantic Personality Update
-
OpenAI’s New ChatGPT Image Policy: Is AI Moderation Becoming Too Lax?
-
AI Notetakers in Meetings—Innovation, Invasion, or Something in Between?
-
AI Glossary: All the Terms You Need to Know
-
The Mystery of ChatGPT’s Forbidden Names
-
Adrian’s Arena: When Will AI Replace the CMO?
Life
Whose English Is Your AI Speaking?
AI tools default to mainstream American English, excluding global voices. Why it matters and what inclusive language design could look like.
Published
1 day agoon
May 10, 2025By
AIinAsia
TL;DR — What You Need To Know
- Most AI tools are trained on mainstream American English, ignoring global Englishes like Singlish or Indian English
- This leads to bias, miscommunication, and exclusion in real-world applications
- To fix it, we need AI that recognises linguistic diversity—not corrects it.
English Bias In AI
Here’s a fun fact that’s not so fun when you think about it: 90% of generative AI training data is in English. But not just any English. Not Nigerian English. Not Indian English. Not the English you’d hear in Singapore’s hawker centres or on the streets of Liverpool. Nope. It’s mostly good ol’ mainstream American English.
That’s the voice most AI systems have learned to mimic, model, and prioritise. Not because it’s better. But because that’s what’s been fed into the system.
So what happens when you build global technology on a single, dominant dialect?
A Monolingual Machine in a Multilingual World
Let’s be clear: English isn’t one language. It’s many. About 1.5 billion people speak it, and almost all of them do so with their own twist. Grammar, vocabulary, intonation, slang—it all varies.
But when your AI tools—from autocorrect to resume scanners—are only trained on one flavour of English (mostly US-centric, polished, white-collar English), a lot of other voices start to disappear. And not quietly.
Speakers of regional or “non-standard” English often find their words flagged as incorrect, their accents ignored, or their syntax marked as a mistake. And that’s not just inconvenient—it’s exclusionary.
Why Mainstream American English Took Over
This dominance didn’t happen by chance. It’s historical, economic, and deeply structural.
The internet was largely developed in the US. Big Tech? Still mostly based there. The datasets used to train AI? Scraped from web content dominated by American media, forums, and publishing.
So, whether you’re chatting with a voice assistant or asking ChatGPT to write your email, what you’re hearing back is often a polished, neutral-sounding, corporate-friendly version of American English. The kind that gets labelled “standard” by systems that were never trained to value anything else.
When AI Gets It Wrong—And Who Pays the Price
Let’s play this out in real life.
- An AI tutor can’t parse a Nigerian English question? The student loses confidence.
- A resume written in Indian English gets rejected by an automated scanner? The applicant misses out.
- Voice transcription software mangles an Australian First Nations story? Cultural heritage gets distorted.
These aren’t small glitches. They’re big failures with real-world consequences. And they’re happening as AI tools are rolled out everywhere—into schools, offices, government services, and creative workspaces.
It’s “Englishes”, Plural
If you’ve grown up being told your English was “wrong,” here’s your reminder: It’s not.
Singlish? Not broken. Just brilliant. Indian English? Full of expressive, efficient, and clever turns of phrase. Aboriginal English? Entirely valid, with its own rules and rich oral traditions.
Language is fluid, social, and fiercely local. And every community that’s been handed English has reshaped it, stretched it, owned it.
But many AI systems still treat these variations as noise. Not worth training on. Not important enough to include in benchmarks. Not profitable to prioritise. So they get left out—and with them, so do their speakers.
Towards Linguistic Justice in AI
Fixing this doesn’t mean rewriting everyone’s grammar. It means rewriting the technology.
We need to stop asking AI to uphold one “correct” form of English, and start asking it to understand the many. That takes:
- More inclusive training data – built on diverse voices, not just dominant ones
- Cross-disciplinary collaboration – between linguists, engineers, educators, and community leaders
- Respect for language rights – including the choice not to digitise certain cultural knowledge
- A mindset shift – from standardising language to supporting expression
Because the goal isn’t to “correct” the speaker. It’s to make the system smarter, fairer, and more reflective of the world it serves.
Ask Yourself: Whose English Is It Anyway?
Next time your AI assistant “fixes” your sentence or flags your phrasing, take a second to pause. Ask: whose English is this system trying to emulate? And more importantly, whose English is it leaving behind?
Language has always been a site of power—but also of play, resistance, and identity. The way forward for AI isn’t more uniformity. It’s more Englishes, embraced on their own terms.
You may also like:
- How Singtel Used AI to Bring Generations Together for Singapore’s SG60
- Revolutionising Workspaces: The Surge of AI and ChatGPT in Indian Companies
- Or try out the free version of Claude AI by tapping here.
Author
Discover more from AIinASIA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Business
Build Your Own Agentic AI — No Coding Required
Want to build a smart AI agent without coding? Here’s how to use ChatGPT and no-code tools to create your own agentic AI — step by step.
Published
2 days agoon
May 9, 2025By
AIinAsia
TL;DR — What You Need to Know About Agentic AI
- Anyone can now build a powerful AI agent using ChatGPT — no technical skills needed.
- Tools like Custom GPTs and Make.com make it easy to create agents that do more than chat — they take action.
- The key is to start with a clear purpose, test it in real-world conditions, and expand as your needs grow.
Anyone Can Build One — And That Includes You
Not too long ago, building a truly capable AI agent felt like something only Silicon Valley engineers could pull off. But the landscape has changed. You don’t need a background in programming or data science anymore — you just need a clear idea of what you want your AI to do, and access to a few easy-to-use tools.
Whether you’re a startup founder looking to automate support, a marketer wanting to build a digital assistant, or simply someone curious about AI, creating your own agent is now well within reach.
What Does ‘Agentic’ Mean, Exactly?
Think of an agentic AI as something far more capable than a standard chatbot. It’s an AI that doesn’t just reply to questions — it can actually do things. That might mean sending emails, pulling information from the web, updating spreadsheets, or interacting with third-party tools and systems.
The difference lies in autonomy. A typical chatbot might respond with a script or FAQ-style answer. An agentic AI, on the other hand, understands the user’s intent, takes appropriate action, and adapts based on ongoing feedback and instructions. It behaves more like a digital team member than a digital toy.
Step 1: Define What You Want It to Do
Before you dive into building anything, it’s important to get crystal clear on what role your agent will play.
Ask yourself:
- Who is going to use this agent?
- What specific tasks should it be responsible for?
- Are there repetitive processes it can take off your plate?
For instance, if you run an online business, you might want an agent that handles frequently asked questions, helps users track their orders, and flags complex queries for human follow-up. If you’re in consulting, your agent could be designed to book meetings, answer basic service questions, or even pre-qualify leads.
Be practical. Focus on solving one or two real problems. You can always expand its capabilities later.
Step 2: Pick a No-Code Platform to Build On
Now comes the fun part: choosing the right platform. If you’re new to this, I recommend starting with OpenAI’s Custom GPTs — it’s the most accessible option and designed for non-coders.
Custom GPTs allow you to build your own version of ChatGPT by simply describing what you want it to do. No technical setup required. You’ll need a ChatGPT Plus or Team subscription to access this feature, but once inside, the process is remarkably straightforward.
If you’re aiming for more complex automation — such as integrating your agent with email systems, customer databases, or CRMs — you may want to explore other no-code platforms like Make.com (formerly Integromat), Dialogflow, or Bubble.io. These offer visual builders where you can map out flows, connect apps, and define logic — all without needing to write a single line of code.
Step 3: Use ChatGPT’s Custom GPT Builder
Let’s say you’ve opted for the Custom GPT route — here’s how to get started.
First, log in to your ChatGPT account and select “Explore GPTs” from the sidebar. Click on “Create,” and you’ll be prompted to describe your agent in natural language. That’s it — just describe what the agent should do, how it should behave, and what tone it should take. For example:
“You are a friendly and professional assistant for my online skincare shop. You help customers with questions about product ingredients, delivery options, and how to track their order status.”
Once you’ve set the description, you can go further by uploading reference materials such as product catalogues, FAQs, or policies. These will give your agent deeper knowledge to draw from. You can also choose to enable additional tools like web browsing or code interpretation, depending on your needs.
Then, test it. Interact with your agent just like a customer would. If it stumbles, refine your instructions. Think of it like coaching — the more clearly you guide it, the better the output becomes.
Step 4: Go Further with Visual Builders
If you’re looking to connect your agent to the outside world — such as pulling data from a spreadsheet, triggering a workflow in your CRM, or sending a Slack message — that’s where tools like Make.com come in.
These platforms allow you to visually design workflows by dragging and dropping different actions and services into a flowchart-style builder. You can set up scenarios like:
- A user asks the agent, “Where’s my order?”
- The agent extracts key info (e.g. email or order number)
- It looks up the order via an API or database
- It responds with the latest shipping status, all in real time
The experience feels a bit like setting up rules in Zapier, but with more control over logic and branching paths. These platforms open up serious possibilities without requiring a developer on your team.
Step 5: Train It, Test It, Then Launch
Once your agent is built, don’t stop there. Test it with real people — ideally your target users. Watch how they interact with it. Are there questions it can’t answer? Instructions it misinterprets? Fix those, and iterate as you go.
Training doesn’t mean coding — it just means improving the agent’s understanding and behaviour by updating your descriptions, feeding it more examples, or adjusting its structure in the visual builder.
Over time, your agent will become more capable, confident, and useful. Think of it as a digital intern that never sleeps — but needs a bit of initial training to perform well.
Why Build One?
The most obvious reason is time. An AI agent can handle repetitive questions, assist users around the clock, and reduce the strain on your support or operations team.
But there’s also the strategic edge. As more companies move towards automation and AI-led support, offering a smart, responsive agent isn’t just a nice-to-have — it’s quickly becoming an expectation.
And here’s the kicker: you don’t need a big team or budget to get started. You just need clarity, curiosity, and a bit of time to explore.
Where to Begin
If you’ve got a ChatGPT Plus account, start by building a Custom GPT. You’ll get an immediate sense of what’s possible. Then, if you need more, look at integrating Make.com or another builder that fits your workflow.
The world of agentic AI is no longer reserved for the technically gifted. It’s now open to creators, business owners, educators, and anyone else with a problem to solve and a bit of imagination.
What kind of AI agent would you build — and what would you have it do for you first? Let us know in the comments below!
You may also like:
- How To Start Using AI Agents To Transform Your Business
- Revolution Ahead: Microsoft’s AI Agents Set to Transform Asian Workplaces
- AI Chatbots: 10 Best ChatGPTs in the ChatGPT Store
- Or tap here to try this out now at ChatGPT by tapping here.
Author
Discover more from AIinASIA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Life
Which ChatGPT Model Should You Choose?
Confused about the ChatGPT model options? This guide clarifies how to choose the right model for your tasks.
Published
3 days agoon
May 9, 2025By
AIinAsia
TL;DR — What You Need to Know:
- GPT-4o is ideal for summarising, brainstorming, and real-time data analysis, with multimodal capabilities.
- GPT-4.5 is the go-to for creativity, emotional intelligence, and communication-based tasks.
- o4-mini is designed for speed and technical queries, while o4-mini-high excels at detailed tasks like advanced coding and scientific explanations.
Navigating the Maze of ChatGPT Models
OpenAI’s ChatGPT has come a long way, but its multitude of models has left many users scratching their heads. If you’re still confused about which version of ChatGPT to use for what task, you’re not alone! Luckily, OpenAI has stepped in with a handy guide that outlines when to choose one model over another. Whether you’re an enterprise user or just getting started, this breakdown will help you make sense of the options at your fingertips.
So, Which ChatGPT Model Makes Sense For You?
Currently, ChatGPT offers five models, each suited to different tasks. They are:
- GPT-4o – the “omni model”
- GPT-4.5 – the creative powerhouse
- o4-mini – the speedster for technical tasks
- o4-mini-high – the heavy lifter for detailed work
- o3 – the analytical thinker for complex, multi-step problems
Which model should you use?
Here’s what OpenAI has to say:
- GPT-4o: If you’re looking for a reliable all-rounder, this is your best bet. It’s perfect for tasks like summarising long texts, brainstorming emails, or generating content on the fly. With its multimodal features, it supports text, images, audio, and even advanced data analysis.
- GPT-4.5: If creativity is your priority, then GPT-4.5 is your go-to. This version shines with emotional intelligence and excels in communication-based tasks. Whether you’re crafting engaging narratives or brainstorming innovative ideas, GPT-4.5 brings a more human-like touch.
- o4-mini: For those in need of speed and precision, o4-mini is the way to go. It handles technical queries like STEM problems and programming tasks swiftly, making it a strong contender for quick problem-solving.
- o4-mini-high: If you’re dealing with intricate, detailed tasks like advanced coding or complex mathematical equations, o4-mini-high delivers the extra horsepower you need. It’s designed for accuracy and higher-level technical work.
- o3: When the task requires multi-step reasoning or strategic planning, o3 is the model you want. It’s designed for deep analysis, complex coding, and problem-solving across multiple stages.
Which one should you pick?
For $20/month with ChatGPT Plus, you’ll have access to all these models and can easily switch between them depending on your task.
But here’s the big question: Which model are you most likely to use? Could OpenAI’s new model options finally streamline your workflow, or will you still be bouncing between versions? Let me know your thoughts!
You may also like:
- What is ChatGPT Plus?
- ChatGPT Plus and Copilot Pro – both powered by OpenAI – which is right for you?
- Or try the free ChatGPT models by tapping here.
Author
Discover more from AIinASIA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Whose English Is Your AI Speaking?

Edit AI Images on the Go with Gemini’s New Update

Build Your Own Agentic AI — No Coding Required
Trending
-
Marketing2 weeks ago
Playbook: How to Use Ideogram.ai (no design skills required!)
-
Life2 weeks ago
WhatsApp Confirms How To Block Meta AI From Your Chats
-
Business2 weeks ago
ChatGPT Just Quietly Released “Memory with Search” – Here’s What You Need to Know
-
Life6 days ago
Geoffrey Hinton’s AI Wake-Up Call — Are We Raising a Killer Cub?
-
Life5 days ago
Too Nice for Comfort? Why OpenAI Rolled Back GPT-4o’s Sycophantic Personality Update
-
Business6 days ago
OpenAI Faces Legal Heat Over Profit Plans — Are We Watching a Moral Meltdown?
-
Life1 week ago
AI Just Slid Into Your DMs: ChatGPT and Perplexity Are Now on WhatsApp
-
Life4 days ago
Why ChatGPT Turned Into a Grovelling Sycophant — And What OpenAI Got Wrong