It seems the days of endlessly generating AI content for free might be drawing to a close, at least for some of the super-powerful tools out there. Both OpenAI and Google have recently, and rather quietly, tightened the reins on what free users can do with their cutting-edge AI models like Sora and Gemini 3 Pro. Essentially, if you're not paying, you're getting less than you were just a short while ago.
The Cost of Creativity: GPU Meltdowns
Let's talk about why this is happening. Generating videos and complex images with AI isn't like sending a quick text message; it's incredibly resource-intensive. These AI models need a huge amount of computational power, often from specialised Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), to create those stunning visuals.
Bill Peebles, who heads up Sora at OpenAI, even tweeted, "Our GPUs are melting and we want to let as many people access Sora as possible!"
That gives you a pretty vivid picture, doesn't it? It highlights the immense demand these services are facing. To cope with this, OpenAI is now limiting free Sora users to just six video generations a day. For those paying for ChatGPT Plus or Pro, your limits remain untouched, but for everyone else, it's a clear signal. If you want more, you'll need to open your wallet.
This isn't the first time we've seen OpenAI make adjustments; remember when Access Restored by OpenAI for Teddy Bear That Recommended Knives and Drugs made headlines? It just goes to show how much these companies are constantly fine-tuning their offerings and policies.
Enjoying this? Get more in your inbox.
Weekly AI news & insights from Asia.
Google's Adjustments for Gemini 3 Pro
Google's also jumped on the bandwagon. When Gemini 3 Pro first launched, it was pretty generous, offering free users up to five prompts a day and three image generations via its Nano Banana Pro tool. Now, though, that's changed. Google's support pages have been updated, and they no longer specify a daily prompt number for Gemini Pro, simply stating that free users get "basic access – daily limits may change frequently." Ouch.
Even more specifically, image generation and editing with Nano Banana Pro are now capped at a measly two images per day for free users. This is a significant drop. If you're using a Google AI Plan, you're still getting a healthy allocation, up to 100 prompts a day for Pro and 500 for Ultra. It seems Google, much like OpenAI, is nudging users towards their paid tiers.
This reminds me of when companies started offering Meta AI: Free Midjourney & Flux For All!, but then quickly realised the immense costs involved.
The Bigger Picture: AI's Maturing Market
It might look like a coincidence that both tech giants are making these changes around the same time, but it's more likely a sign of the AI industry maturing. We're seeing a shift where the massive computational costs of running these advanced AI models are starting to hit home for the providers.
Think about it; generating a complex AI video or image isn't cheap. These companies are footing massive bills for electricity, hardware, and maintenance. As demand for AI tools continues to explode, it's only natural they'd start looking for ways to monetise their offerings more effectively. We've already seen how Small vs. Large Language Models Explained can impact user experience. For a deeper dive into the economics of AI, you might find this article on the cost to train a large language model insightful The Information.
I wouldn't be at all surprised if we see more of these "gentle nudges" towards paid plans over the next year or so. The business models are catching up with the reality of running these incredibly powerful, yet expensive, AI services.
So, while AI tools aren't going anywhere, your days of getting top-tier access for free might just be numbered. It's an interesting time to be watching the AI space, that's for sure!










Latest Comments (2)
This is bound to happen, isn't it? Everything good eventually gets bottlenecked. Just hope it doesn't stifle innovation for the common man.
Interesting read! So, if these giants are restricting free access, does that mainly affect the advanced features, or will even basic queries eventually become paywalled? I wonder if this will push local tech companies here in Indonesia to develop more affordable, homegrown AI solutions. That could be a game-changer, right?
Leave a Comment