Connect with us

News

DeepSeek in Singapore: AI Miracle or Security Minefield?

Discover why Singapore firms are both intrigued and cautious about DeepSeek. Cost savings, data security, and AI biases—here’s what you need to know.

Published

on

DeepSeek in Singpore

TL;DR – What You Need to Know in 30 Seconds

  • DeepSeek is an open-source AI model offering cost savings of up to 60 percent compared to established LLMs.
  • Major Singapore firms, including banks and consultancies, restrict employee use of generative AI tools like DeepSeek to avoid data security pitfalls.
  • Early tests flag bias and potential data retention issues, plus concerns that DeepSeek might store user prompts for further training.
  • Some governments (South Korea, Italy, Australia) have blocked DeepSeek on official devices, reminiscent of ChatGPT’s early bans.
  • Enterprise indemnities (available from providers like Microsoft, IBM, and OpenAI) aren’t yet offered by DeepSeek, adding a legal wrinkle for corporate users.
  • A handful of businesses in Singapore do use DeepSeek, citing lower costs and strong performance for tasks like coding and customer support.

DeepSeek in Singapore—A Fresh AI Challenger Emerges

DeepSeek shot to fame when it launched its R1 model in January, confidently declaring it could match the performance of OpenAI’s tech at a fraction of the cost. According to the Chinese AI start-up behind it, R1 cost about S$7.6 million (RM24.8 million) to train—significantly less than the hundreds of millions typically spent by US tech giants on large language models (LLMs).

The initial response? Absolutely electric. R1 downloads soared, US tech stocks took a dip, and industry gurus started whispering that DeepSeek could disrupt the cosy world of established AI players like OpenAI, Google, and Amazon Web Services.

Why Singapore Is Taking a Careful Stance

Despite DeepSeek’s potential to slash costs (some say 40 to 60 per cent on infrastructure), many Singaporean firms are treading carefully. Big players, including banks and consulting agencies, have laid down strict rules to stop employees from diving into generative AI tools—DeepSeek included—without proper due diligence.

Why the reluctance? In a word: security. Concerns range from data privacy and AI bias to whether employees might (even inadvertently) feed confidential information into an external system. As Hanno Stegmann, Managing Director and Partner at Boston Consulting Group’s (BCG) AI team, puts it:

“It is worth waiting for a more thorough assessment of DeepSeek’s risks before using the model.”
Hanno Stegmann, Managing Director and Partner at Boston Consulting Group’s (BCG) AI Team
Tweet

Open-Source but Far From Problem-Free

DeepSeek’s open-source nature might be appealing to tech enthusiasts and smaller businesses—particularly those on a tight budget. The model’s cost-saving potential is real, and local AI consumer insights platform Ai Palette estimates substantial reductions in expensive computing resources.

But open-source doesn’t automatically mean everything’s rosy. Early tests suggest DeepSeek might not meet every responsible AI standard. Some critics say the model offers selective answers, especially around topics that might be censored by the Chinese government, raising questions about transparency and bias.

Advertisement

Then there’s the matter of data retention. Some experts worry that prompts and results typed into DeepSeek might be stored and used to further train the model. No one’s entirely sure how much data is kept or for how long. In a nutshell, yes, DeepSeek is cheaper. But it could also open a giant can of legal and privacy worms.

Governments and Legal Eagles Weigh In

A few countries—South Korea, Italy, and Australia—have outright blocked DeepSeek on government devices, citing security concerns. This echoes the early days of ChatGPT when it, too, faced temporary restrictions in several jurisdictions.

Law firms in Singapore are equally cautious. RPC tech lawyer Nicholas Lauw notes that generative AI is off-limits for client data until safety is thoroughly established:

“Our stance is precautionary, designed to maintain the trust and integrity of our client relationships, and aligns with wider regulatory guidance and best practice.”
Nicholas Lauw, RPC Tech Lawyer
Tweet

Firms like RPC and others are testing LLMs in carefully controlled environments, checking legal risks and data security measures before giving any green light.

Indemnity and Enterprise Editions

Many big AI developers—think Microsoft, IBM, Adobe, Google, and OpenAI—offer enterprise products with indemnity clauses, effectively shielding corporate clients from certain legal risks. DeepSeek, however, currently doesn’t have such an enterprise version on the market.

“DeepSeek doesn’t have an enterprise product yet. It might be open-source, but this alone doesn’t protect corporate users from potential legal risks.”
Rajesh Sreenivasan, Head of Tech Law at Rajah and Tann
Tweet

In the meantime, banks like OCBC and UOB rely on internal AI chatbots for coding tasks or archiving. OCBC has put in place system restrictions to block external AI chatbots—DeepSeek included—unless they meet the bank’s stringent security checks.

The Early Adopters

Not everyone is standing on the sidelines. Babbobox chief executive Alex Chan allows employees to experiment with multiple AI models, including DeepSeek, for inspiration and coding help. Wiz.AI has already integrated R1 for text-based customer support. And smaller businesses see DeepSeek as a fantastic cost-cutter to help them innovate without requiring monstrous computing setups.

Advertisement

Then there’s the potential bigger-picture impact on the local AI scene. According to Kenddrick Chan from LSE Ideas, DeepSeek’s lower-cost approach might encourage more Singapore-based firms to jump on the AI bandwagon and spur further experimentation in generative AI.

So, What’s Next?

At present, Singapore’s Ministry of Digital Development and Information has taken the neutral route: it doesn’t typically comment on commercial products but advises companies to do their own thorough evaluations.

For many businesses, DeepSeek remains both exciting and nerve-racking. Stegmann from BCG sums it up nicely:

“It is fair to say that first releases of many LLMs had some issues at the beginning that had to be ironed out based on user feedback and changes made to the model.”
Hanno Stegmann, Managing Director and Partner at Boston Consulting Group’s (BCG) AI Team
Tweet

If DeepSeek can address nagging worries about data privacy, censorship bias, and enterprise-grade support, it may well carve a place for itself in Singapore’s AI market. For now, though, the jury’s still out—and corporate Singapore isn’t rushing to deliver its verdict.

And that’s the low-down on DeepSeek in Singapore!

Will it become a shining example of cost-effective AI innovation, or will data privacy worries hold it back? Only time—and thorough due diligence—will tell. In the meantime, keep those eyes peeled, dear readers. The AI space in Asia just got even more interesting. Don’t forget to subscribe to hear about the latest updates on DeepSeek in Singapore as well as other news, tips and tricks here at AIinASIA! Or feel free to leave a comment below.

You may also like:

Advertisement

Author


Discover more from AIinASIA

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

News

OpenAI’s New ChatGPT Image Policy: Is AI Moderation Becoming Too Lax?

ChatGPT now generates previously banned images of public figures and symbols. Is this freedom overdue or dangerously permissive?

Published

on

OpenAI moderation policy

TL;DR – What You Need to Know in 30 Seconds

  • ChatGPT can now generate images of public figures, previously disallowed.
  • Requests related to physical and racial traits are now accepted.
  • Controversial symbols are permitted in strictly educational contexts.
  • OpenAI argues for nuanced moderation rather than blanket censorship.
  • Move aligns with industry trends towards relaxed content moderation policies.

Is AI Moderation Becoming Too Lax?

ChatGPT just got a visual upgrade—generating whimsical Studio Ghibli-style images that quickly became an internet sensation. But look beyond these charming animations, and you’ll see something far more controversial: OpenAI has significantly eased its moderation policies, allowing users to generate images previously considered taboo. So, is this a timely move towards creative freedom or a risky step into a moderation minefield?

ChatGPT’s new visual prowess

OpenAI’s latest model, GPT-4o, introduces impressive image-generation capabilities directly inside ChatGPT. With advanced photo editing, sharper text rendering, and improved spatial representation, ChatGPT now rivals specialised image AI tools.

But the buzz isn’t just about cartoonish visuals; it’s about OpenAI’s major shift on sensitive content moderation.

Moving beyond blanket bans

Previously, if you asked ChatGPT to generate an image featuring public figures—say Donald Trump or Elon Musk—it would simply refuse. Similarly, requests for hateful symbols or modifications highlighting racial characteristics (like “make this person’s eyes look more Asian”) were strictly off-limits.

No longer. Joanne Jang, OpenAI’s model behaviour lead, explained the shift clearly:

Advertisement
“We’re shifting from blanket refusals in sensitive areas to a more precise approach focused on preventing real-world harm. The goal is to embrace humility—recognising how much we don’t know, and positioning ourselves to adapt as we learn.”

In short, fewer instant rejections, more nuanced responses.

Exactly what’s allowed now?

With this update, ChatGPT can now depict public figures upon request, moving away from selectively policing celebrity imagery. OpenAI will allow individuals to opt-out if they don’t want AI-generated images of themselves—shifting control back to users.

Controversially, ChatGPT also now accepts previously prohibited requests related to sensitive physical traits, like ethnicity or body shape adjustments, sparking fresh debate around ethical AI usage.

Handling the hottest topics

OpenAI is cautiously permitting requests involving controversial symbols—like swastikas—but only in neutral or educational contexts, never endorsing harmful ideologies. GPT-4o also continues to enforce stringent protections, especially around images involving children, setting even tighter standards than its predecessor, DALL-E 3.

Yet, loosening moderation around sensitive imagery has inevitably reignited fierce debates over censorship, freedom of speech, and AI’s ethical responsibilities.

Advertisement

A strategic shift or political move?

OpenAI maintains these changes are non-political, emphasising instead their longstanding commitment to user autonomy. But the timing is provocative, coinciding with increasing regulatory pressure and scrutiny from politicians like Republican Congressman Jim Jordan, who recently challenged tech companies about perceived biases in AI moderation.

This relaxation of restrictions echoes similar moves by other tech giants—Meta and X have also dialled back content moderation after facing similar criticisms. AI image moderation, however, poses unique risks due to its potential for widespread misinformation and cultural distortion, as Google’s recent controversy over historically inaccurate Gemini images has demonstrated.

What’s next for AI moderation?

ChatGPT’s new creative freedom has delighted users, but the wider implications remain uncertain. While memes featuring beloved animation styles flood social media, this same freedom could enable the rapid spread of less harmless imagery. OpenAI’s balancing act could quickly draw regulatory attention—particularly under the Trump administration’s more critical stance towards tech censorship.

The big question now: Where exactly do we draw the line between creative freedom and responsible moderation?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!

Advertisement

You may also like:

Author


Discover more from AIinASIA

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

News

Tencent Joins China’s AI Race with New T1 Reasoning Model Launch

Tencent launches its powerful new T1 reasoning model amid growing AI competition in China, while startup Manus gains major regulatory and media support.

Published

on

Tencent T1 reasoning model

TL;DR – What You Need to Know in 30 Seconds

  • Tencent has launched its upgraded T1 reasoning model
  • Competition heats up in China’s AI market
  • Beijing spotlights Manus
  • Manus partners with Alibaba’s Qwen AI team

The Tencent T1 Reasoning Model Has Launched

Tencent has officially launched the upgraded version of its T1 reasoning model, intensifying competition within China’s already bustling artificial intelligence sector. Announced on Friday (21 March), the T1 reasoning model promises significant enhancements over its preview edition, including faster responses and improved processing of lengthy texts.

In a WeChat announcement, Tencent highlighted T1’s strengths, noting it “keeps the content logic clear and the text neat,” while maintaining an “extremely low hallucination rate,” referring to the AI’s tendency to generate accurate, reliable outputs without inventing false information.

The Turbo S Advantage

The T1 model is built on Tencent’s own Turbo S foundational language technology, introduced last month. According to Tencent, Turbo S notably outpaces competitor DeepSeek’s R1 model when processing queries, a claim backed up by benchmarks Tencent shared in its announcement. These tests showed T1 leading in several key knowledge and reasoning categories.

Tencent’s latest launch comes amid heightened rivalry sparked largely by DeepSeek, a Chinese startup whose powerful yet affordable AI models recently stunned global tech markets. DeepSeek’s success has spurred local companies like Tencent into accelerating their own AI investments.

Beijing Spotlights Rising AI Star Manus

The race isn’t limited to tech giants. Manus, a homegrown AI startup, also received a major boost from Chinese authorities this week. On Thursday, state broadcaster CCTV featured Manus for the first time, comparing its advanced AI agent technology favourably against more traditional chatbot models.

Advertisement

Manus became a sensation globally after unveiling what it claims to be the world’s first truly general-purpose AI agent, capable of independently making decisions and executing tasks with minimal prompting. This autonomy differentiates it sharply from existing chatbots such as ChatGPT and DeepSeek.

Crucially, Manus has now cleared significant regulatory hurdles. Beijing’s municipal authorities confirmed that a China-specific version of Manus’ AI assistant, Monica, is fully registered and compliant with the country’s strict generative AI guidelines, a necessary step before public release.

Further strengthening its domestic foothold, Manus recently announced a strategic partnership with Alibaba’s Qwen AI team, a collaboration likely to accelerate the rollout of Manus’ agent technology across China. Currently, Manus’ agent is accessible only via invite codes, with an eager waiting list already surpassing two million.

The Race Has Only Just Begun

With Tencent’s T1 now officially in play and Manus gaining momentum, China’s AI competition is clearly heating up, promising exciting innovations ahead. As tech giants and ambitious startups alike push boundaries, China’s AI landscape is becoming increasingly dynamic—leaving tech enthusiasts and investors eagerly watching to see who’ll take the lead next.

What do YOU think?

Could China’s AI startups like Manus soon disrupt Silicon Valley’s dominance, or will giants like Tencent keep the competition at bay?

Advertisement

You may also like:

Tencent Takes on DeepSeek: Meet the Lightning-Fast Hunyuan Turbo S

DeepSeek in Singapore: AI Miracle or Security Minefield?

Alibaba’s AI Ambitions: Fueling Cloud Growth and Expanding in Asia

Learn more by tapping here to visit the Tencent website.

Advertisement

Author


Discover more from AIinASIA

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

News

Google’s Gemini AI is Coming to Your Chrome Browser — Here’s the Inside Scoop

Google is integrating Gemini AI into Chrome browser through a new experimental feature called Gemini Live in Chrome (GLIC). Here’s everything you need to know.

Published

on

Gemini AI Chrome

TL;DR – What You Need to Know in 30 Seconds

  • Google is integrating Gemini AI into its Chrome browser via an experimental feature called Gemini Live in Chrome (GLIC).
  • GLIC adds a clickable Gemini icon next to Chrome’s window controls, opening a floating AI assistant modal.
  • Currently being tested in Chrome Canary, the feature aims to streamline AI interactions without leaving the browser.

Welcoming Google’s Gemini AI to Your Chrome Browser

If there’s one thing tech giants love more than AI right now, it’s finding new ways to shove that AI into everything we use. And Google—never one to be left behind—is apparently stepping up their game by sliding their Gemini AI directly into your beloved Chrome browser. Yep, that’s the buzz on the digital street!

This latest AI adventure popped up thanks to eagle-eyed folks at Windows Latest, who spotted intriguing code snippets hidden in Google’s Chrome Canary version. Canary, if you haven’t played with it before, is Google’s playground version of Chrome. It’s the spot where they test all their wild and wonderful experimental features, and it looks like Gemini’s next up on stage.

Say Hello to GLIC: Gemini Live in Chrome

They’re calling this new integration “GLIC,” which stands for “Gemini Live in Chrome.” (Yes, tech companies never resist a snappy acronym, do they?) According to the early glimpses from Canary, GLIC isn’t quite ready for primetime yet—no shock there—but the outlines are pretty clear.

Once activated, GLIC introduces a nifty Gemini icon neatly tucked up beside your usual minimise, maximise, and close window buttons. Click it, and a floating Gemini assistant modal pops open, ready and waiting for your prompts, questions, or random curiosities.

Prefer a less conspicuous spot? Google’s thought of that too—GLIC can also nestle comfortably in your system tray, offering quick access to Gemini without cluttering your browser interface.

Advertisement

Why Gemini in Chrome Actually Makes Sense

Having Gemini hanging out front and centre in Chrome feels like a smart move—especially when you’re knee-deep in tabs and need quick answers or creative inspiration on the fly. No more toggling between browser tabs or separate apps; your AI assistant is literally at your fingertips.

But let’s keep expectations realistic here—this is still Canary we’re talking about. Features here often need plenty of polish and tweaking before making it to the stable Chrome we all rely on. But the potential? Definitely exciting.

What’s Next?

For now, we’ll keep a close eye on GLIC’s developments. Will Gemini revolutionise how we interact with Chrome, or will it end up another quirky experiment? Either way, Google’s bet on AI is clearly ramping up, and we’re here for it. Don’t forget to sign up to our occasional newsletter to stay informed about this and other happenings around AI in Asia and beyond.

Stay tuned—we’ll share updates as soon as Google lifts the curtains a bit further.

You may also like:

Author

Advertisement

Discover more from AIinASIA

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending

Discover more from AIinASIA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading