Business
Building local AI regulation from the ground up in Asia
How Asia’s diverse economies are designing AI rules from first principles — examining national innovation aims, local priorities and global harmonisation. Adrian Watkins guides readers through emerging frameworks in China, Japan, South Korea, India and Singapore, examining the structure, drivers and trade-offs in building local AI regulation in Asia.
Can Asia build AI regulation from the ground up — and what happens when local priorities diverge? That’s the central question for a region where national goals, governance culture and tech maturity vary sharply. Building local AI regulation in Asia starts with national intent — whether that means ranking first on economic value or safeguarding national security — and progresses through ecosystem design, from voluntary ethics to binding laws.
Across this complex landscape, some clear patterns emerge: a spectrum from assertive control to innovation‑friendly frameworks, many anchored in existing data laws, with countries grappling with the tension between being sovereign “rule‑makers” or “rule‑takers”
TL;DR — What You Need To Know
- Asia is diverging, not converging on AI regulation — national strategies reflect different priorities and capacities.
- China sets the tone with a top‑down, risk‑averse approach, mandating registration, labelling and severe penalties.
- Japan exemplifies a soft‑law model, emphasising voluntary compliance with future movement toward statutes.
- South Korea’s Basic Act arrives in 2026 with a risk‑based framework — but implementation details await.
- India is cautious and evolving, leaning on existing regulatory bodies while building consensus.
- Singapore remains a closely watched rule‑maker, integrating privacy foundations into sectoral AI governance.
1. China: Assertive from the top
China’s regulatory architecture is a compelling starting point — in barely two years, it has enacted comprehensive requirements for AI platforms, from foundation model sourcing to content labelling and security certification. Under the Interim Measures on generative AI and the Algorithmic Recommendation rules, providers must register and allow user opt-out from algorithmic feeds, undergo government reviews, and clearly label machine‑generated content.
Non‑compliance is not treated lightly: fines of up to US$140,000 – $7 million, plus service suspensions or shutdowns — are par for the course. Criminal liability and social credit constraints round out the enforcement toolkit . The result? A system defined by risk‑control and state oversight, built from existing privacy and cybersecurity regulations curated into a purpose‑built architecture.
China’s regulatory DNA
- Registration of services
- Security review by the Cyberspace Administration
- Data‑origin transparency, labelling and user choices
- Harsh penalties, including criminal exposure
This is governance as industrial policy — seeking economic leadership while protecting political and social order.
2. Japan: Voluntary, with quiet statutory push
In contrast, Japan has chosen gradualism. Its governance relies on non‑binding frameworks — the Social Principles of Human‑Centred AI (2019), AI Governance Guidelines (2024), and a Strategy Council formed to steer next‑gen policy. Alongside its privacy law (APPI), Japan has begun testing the waters for hard‑law obligations with a draft Basic Act on Responsible AI, though this remains early stage.
The carrot of voluntary compliance therefore still reigns. Public procurement, research grants or certification schemes may align behaviours — but penalties are only triggered when AI systems breach underlying IP or data‑protection laws. Given its G7 status and push in open‑source, Japan remains a cautious pro‑innovation centre .
Japan’s governance toolkit
- Ethical principles and sector guidelines
- Voluntary risk assessment and transparency
- Soft‑law nudges into procurement or finance
- Path to possible full legislation
This model offers flexibility — but with limited deterrence.
3. South Korea: Risk-based structure arrives
South Korea is set to introduce its Basic Act on AI — the AI Framework Act — in January 2026, after a year’s transition. The focus is on high‑impact AI — defined by potential risks to life, rights and critical services. The law requires human oversight, transparency in generative outputs, risk and impact assessments, retention of audit trails, and notification in public procurement .
It also has extraterritorial reach: foreign providers targeting the Korean market must appoint a local representative .
Exact thresholds for high‑impact classification, capital turnover rules and compute limits will be set through Presidential Decrees, to be delivered by January 2026. The passage of the Act marks a new phase of structured, risk‑based regulation in APAC.
Key features of Korea’s Act
- Definition of “AI Business Operators”
- Risk‑tiering based on sector and application
- Human oversight, transparency obligations, audit logs
- Local representation required
- Decrees to finalise thresholds.
4. India: Cautious consensus and existing laws
India’s approach remains in flux, navigating between “pro‑innovation rule‑maker” and cautious intervention . A Digital Personal Data Protection Act (2023) extends GDPR‑style rights, operational from around mid‑late 2025, but enforcement is still being structured.
The government has floated AI advisory frameworks — controversially mandating pre‑deployment permissions in 2024, then retracting in response to pushback . MeitY and the Principal Scientific Adviser are coordinating an inter‑ministerial committee; sectoral regulators (RBI, TRAI) are drafting use‑case rules.
Industry and civil society call for tiered transparency obligations, recourse rights and civil compensation — but also recommend self‑ and co‑regulation over full‑scale law .
India’s emerging policy framework
- Existing privacy law (DPDP Act)
- Multi‑stakeholder committee underway
- Advisory guidance, pending new Digital India Act
- Sector rules on finance, telecom, labour
India’s direction is pluralistic — building local frameworks but taking time to refine and test before committing to hard rules.
5. Singapore & ASEAN: Model pathways and regional guidance
Singapore is the highest‑profile “rule‑maker” in Southeast Asia, via its Model AI Governance Framework and AI Verify toolkit — which institutionalise ethics through best‑practice checklists, transparency‑by‑design and fairness testing . National guidelines for healthcare AI and corporate responsibility initiatives bolster this, while its PDPA ensures strong data‑centric compliance.
ASEAN has mirrored this with its Guide on AI Governance and Ethics (2024) — offering principles and harmonisation pathways to its 10+ member states . Smaller nations, often lacking domestic detail, lean heavily on Singapore’s playbook and OECD‑style standards.
Divergence, convergence and international harmonisation
Asia’s regulatory map is clearly fragmented. China’s state‑driven, risk‑averse controls contrast starkly with Japan’s voluntary model, Korea’s structured but partially deferred enforcement, India’s deliberative hybrid, and Singapore’s sectoral ethics codification .
Countries broadly fall into four archetypes:
- Pro‑innovation, Rule‑making: Japan, India, Singapore, Korea (to some extent)
- Pro‑security, Rule‑making: China – with tight regulation and local enforcement
- Pro‑innovation, Rule‑taking: ASEAN members adopting Singapore’s guidelines
- Pro‑security, Rule‑taking: not yet dominant in APAC, more theoretical
Ultimately, Asia is moving from privacy/sectoral law to structured AI frameworks, blending soft law, risk‑based rules and domestic enforcement. Regional dialogue — through bodies like ASEAN and G7 — will be essential in aligning APAC nations to global norms.
What that means for businesses
If you are building or deploying AI in Asia:
- Expect a patchwork, not a pan‑Asian code.
- China demands compliance first; Japan, late adoption via guidance; Korea, codified obligations from 2026.
- India offers workability but remains in transition.
- Singapore is your ethical benchmark, ASEAN your guide to regional consistency.
Adapting tech systems to this complexity means embedding risk‑based, privacy‑centred compliance from the start, leveraging certification tools, and monitoring both sectoral and regional signals.
Final Word
Building local AI regulation in Asia isn’t a blanket exercise — it’s tailored, national and competitive. Each country is testing its own balance between innovation, control and sovereignty. For businesses, the imperative is clear: prepare global systems that comply locally, and engage early with country‑specific frameworks — whether that’s China’s registries, Japan’s emerging statutes or Korea’s high‑impact thresholds.
Will the next decade bring a patchwork of permanent divergence — or start to knit together a pan‑Asian standard? As digital scales across borders, the race isn’t just about AI — it’s about building influence through the rules of the game.
You May Also Like:
- India’s Shift in AI Regulation
- Go Deeper: Asia’s AI Revolution – A Journey of Growth, Challenges, and Promise
- South Korea’s AI Development: A Future Blueprint?
Author
Discover more from AIinASIA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Business
Adrian’s Arena: Stop Collecting AI Tools and Start Building a Stack
How to transform scattered AI tools into a strategic stack that drives real business outcomes. Practical advice for startups and enterprises.
TL;DR — What You Need To Know
- Stop collecting random AI tools and start building an intentional “stack” – a connected system of tools that work together to solve your specific business problems.
- The best AI stacks aren’t complicated but intentional – they reduce friction, create clarity, and become second nature to your team’s workflow.
- For Southeast Asian businesses, successful AI stacks must address regional complexities like language diversity, mobile-first users, and local regulations.
Why Your AI Approach Needs a Rethink
Look around and you’ll see AI tools popping up everywhere – they’re like coffee shops in Singapore, one on every corner promising to give your business that perfect boost.
But here’s what I keep noticing in boardrooms and startup meetings: everyone’s got tools, but hardly anyone has a proper stack.
Most teams aren’t struggling to find AI tools. They’re drowning in disconnected tabs – ChatGPT open here, Perplexity bookmarked there, Canva floating around somewhere, and that Zapier automation you set up months ago but barely remember how to use.
They’ve got all the ingredients but no kitchen. No real system for turning all this potential into actual business results.
AI stack vs. tool collection
It’s so easy to jump on the latest shiny AI thing, isn’t it? The hard part is connecting these tools into something that actually moves your business forward.
When I talk to leaders about building real AI capability, I don’t start by asking what features they want. I ask what problems they’re trying to solve. What’s slowing their team down? Where are people burning valuable time on tasks that don’t deserve it?
That’s where stack thinking comes in. It’s not about collecting tools – it’s about designing a thoughtful, functional system that reflects how your business actually operates.
The best AI stacks I’ve seen aren’t complicated – they’re intentional. They remove friction. They create clarity. And most importantly, they become second nature to your team.
Building Intentional AI Workflows
For smaller teams and startups, an effective AI stack can be surprisingly simple. I often show founders how just four tools – something like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Ideogram, and Canva – can take you from initial concept to finished marketing asset in a single afternoon. It’s lean, fast, and totally doable for under $100 a month. For small businesses, this kind of setup becomes a secret weapon that levels the playing field without expanding headcount.
But once you’re in mid-sized or enterprise territory, things get more layered. You’re not just looking for speed – you’re managing complexity, accountability, and scale. Tools need to talk to each other, yes, but they also need to fit into approval workflows, compliance requirements, and multi-market realities.
That’s where most random collections of tools start to break down.
When Your AI Stack Actually Works
You know your AI stack is working when it feels like flow, not friction.
Your marketing team moves from insight to idea to finished asset in hours instead of weeks. Your sales team walks into meetings already knowing the context that matters. Your HR people personalise onboarding without rebuilding slides for every new hire.
This isn’t theoretical – I’ve watched it happen in real organisations across Southeast Asia, where tools aren’t just available, they’re aligned. When AI stacks are built thoughtfully around actual business needs, they deliver more than efficiency – they bring clarity, confidence, and control.
And again, this is exactly what we focus on at SQREEM. Our ONE platform isn’t designed to replace your stack – it’s built to expand its capabilities, delivering the intelligence layer that boosts performance, cuts waste, and turns behavioural signals into strategic advantage.
Because the best stacks don’t just work harder. They help your people think better and move faster.
The Southeast Asia Factor
If you’re building a business in Southeast Asia, the game is a little different.
Your AI stack needs to handle the region’s complexity – language diversity, mobile-first users, and regulatory differences. That means choosing tools that are multilingual, work well on phones, and respect local privacy laws like PDPA. There’s no point automating customer outreach if it gets flagged in Vietnam or launching a chatbot that can’t understand Bahasa Indonesia.
The smartest stacks I’ve seen in SEA are light, fast, and culturally aware. They don’t try to do everything. They focus on what matters locally – and they deliver results.
Why This Matters Right Now
If AI is the new electricity, then stacks are the wiring. They determine what gets powered, what stays dark, and what actually transforms your business.
Too many teams are stuck in the “tool hoarding” phase – downloading, demoing, trying things out. But that’s not transformation. That’s just tinkering.
The real shift happens when teams design their workflows with AI at the centre. When they align their stack with their business strategy – and build in engines like SQREEM that drive real-world precision from day one.
That’s when AI stops being a novelty and starts being your competitive edge.
It’s the same shift we see in startups that go from idea to execution in a weekend. It’s the same shift large companies make when they finally move from small pilots to company-wide impact.
And it’s available to any team willing to think system-first.
A Simple Test
Here’s a quick way to check where you stand: If every AI tool you use disappeared overnight… what part of your workflow would actually break?
If the answer is “nothing much,” you don’t have a stack. You have some clever toys.
But if the answer is “everything would grind to a halt” – good. That means you’re not just playing with AI. You’ve made it essential to how you operate.
And here’s the harder question: Is your AI stack simply helping you move faster – or is it actually helping you compete smarter?
If you’re serious about building the kind of AI stack that drives real outcomes – not just activity – I’d love to hear how you’re approaching it. What’s in your stack today? Where are you seeing gaps? Drop a comment below and let’s swap ideas.
Thanks for reading!
Adrian 🙂
Author
Discover more from AIinASIA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Business
Apple’s China AI pivot puts Washington on edge
Apple’s partnership with Alibaba to deliver AI services in China has sparked concern among U.S. lawmakers and security experts, highlighting growing tensions in global technology markets.
As Apple courts Alibaba for its iPhone AI partnership in China, U.S. lawmakers see more than just a tech deal taking shape.
TL;DR — What You Need To Know
- Apple has reportedly selected Alibaba’s Qwen AI model to power its iPhone features in China
- U.S. lawmakers and security officials are alarmed over data access and strategic implications
- The deal has not been officially confirmed by Apple, but Alibaba’s chairman has acknowledged it
- China remains a critical market for Apple amid declining iPhone sales
- The partnership highlights the growing difficulty of operating across rival tech spheres
Apple Intelligence meets the Great Firewall
Apple’s strategic pivot to partner with Chinese tech giant Alibaba for delivering AI services in China has triggered intense scrutiny in Washington. The collaboration, necessitated by China’s blocking of OpenAI services, raises profound questions about data security, technological sovereignty, and the intensifying tech rivalry between the United States and China. As Apple navigates declining iPhone sales in the crucial Chinese market, this partnership underscores the increasing difficulty for multinational tech companies to operate seamlessly across divergent technological and regulatory environments.
Apple Intelligence Meets Chinese Regulations
When Apple unveiled its ambitious “Apple Intelligence” system in June, it marked the company’s most significant push into AI-enhanced services. For Western markets, Apple seamlessly integrated OpenAI’s ChatGPT as a cornerstone partner for English-language capabilities. However, this implementation strategy hit an immediate roadblock in China, where OpenAI’s services remain effectively banned under the country’s stringent digital regulations.
Faced with this market-specific challenge, Apple initiated discussions with several Chinese AI leaders to identify a compliant local partner capable of delivering comparable functionality to Chinese consumers. The shortlist reportedly included major players in China’s burgeoning AI sector:
- Baidu, known for its Ernie Bot AI system
- DeepSeek, an emerging player in foundation models
- Tencent, the social media and gaming powerhouse
- Alibaba, whose open-source Qwen model has gained significant attention
While Apple has maintained its characteristic silence regarding partnership details, recent developments strongly suggest that Alibaba’s Qwen model has emerged as the chosen solution. The arrangement was seemingly confirmed when Alibaba’s chairman made an unplanned reference to the collaboration during a public appearance.
Washington’s Mounting Concerns
The revelation of Apple’s China-specific AI strategy has elicited swift and pronounced reactions from U.S. policymakers. Members of the House Select Committee on China have raised alarms about the potential implications, with some reports indicating that White House officials have directly engaged with Apple executives on the matter.
Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi of the House Intelligence Committee didn’t mince words, describing the development as “extremely disturbing.” His reaction encapsulates broader concerns about American technological advantages potentially benefiting Chinese competitors through such partnerships.
Greg Allen, Director of the Wadhwani A.I. Centre at CSIS, framed the situation in competitive terms:
“The United States is in an AI race with China, and we just don’t want American companies helping Chinese companies run faster.”
The concerns expressed by Washington officials and security experts include:
- Data Sovereignty Issues: Questions about where and how user data from AI interactions would be stored, processed, and potentially accessed
- Model Training Advantages: Concerns that the vast user interactions from Apple devices could help improve Alibaba’s foundational AI models
- National Security Implications: Worries about whether sensitive information could inadvertently flow through Chinese servers
- Regulatory Compliance: Questions about how Apple will navigate China’s content restrictions and censorship requirements
In response to these growing concerns, U.S. agencies are reportedly discussing whether to place Alibaba and other Chinese AI companies on a restricted entity list. Such a designation would formally limit collaboration between American and Chinese AI firms, potentially derailing arrangements like Apple’s reported partnership.
Commercial Necessities vs. Strategic Considerations
Apple’s motivation for pursuing a China-specific AI solution is straightforward from a business perspective. China remains one of the company’s largest and most important markets, despite recent challenges. Earlier this spring, iPhone sales in China declined by 24% year over year, highlighting the company’s vulnerability in this critical market.
Without a viable AI strategy for Chinese users, Apple risks further erosion of its market position at precisely the moment when AI features are becoming central to consumer technology choices. Chinese competitors like Huawei have already launched their own AI-enhanced smartphones, increasing pressure on Apple to respond.
The situation is further complicated by China’s own regulatory environment, which requires foreign technology companies to comply with data localisation rules and content restrictions. These requirements effectively necessitate some form of local partnership for AI services.
A Blueprint for the Decoupled Future?
Whether Apple’s partnership with Alibaba proceeds as reported or undergoes modifications in response to political pressure, the episode provides a revealing glimpse into the fragmenting global technology landscape.
As digital ecosystems increasingly align with geopolitical boundaries, multinational technology firms face increasingly complex strategic decisions:
- Regionalised Technology Stacks: Companies may need to develop and maintain separate technological implementations for different markets
- Partnership Dilemmas: Collaborations beneficial in one market may create political liabilities in others
- Regulatory Navigation: Operating across divergent regulatory environments requires sophisticated compliance strategies
- Resource Allocation: Developing market-specific solutions increases costs and complexity
Looking Forward
For now, Apple Intelligence has no confirmed launch date for the Chinese market. However, with new iPhone models traditionally released in autumn, Apple faces mounting time pressure to finalise its AI strategy.
The company’s eventual approach could signal broader trends in how global technology firms navigate an increasingly bifurcated digital landscape. Will companies maintain unified global platforms with minimal adaptations, or will we see the emergence of fundamentally different technological experiences across major markets?
As this situation evolves, it highlights a critical reality for the technology sector: in an era of intensifying great power competition, even seemingly routine business decisions can quickly acquire strategic significance.
You May Also Like:
- Alibaba’s AI Ambitions: Fueling Cloud Growth and Expanding in Asia
- Apple Unleashes AI Revolution with Apple Intelligence: A Game Changer in Asia’s Tech Landscape
- Apple and Meta Explore AI Partnership
Author
Discover more from AIinASIA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Business
AI Just Killed 8 Jobs… But Created 15 New Ones Paying £100k+
AI is eliminating roles — but creating new ones that pay £100k+. Here are 15 fast-growing jobs in AI and how to prepare for them in Asia.
TL;DR — What You Need to Know:
- AI is replacing roles in moderation, customer service, writing, and warehousing—but it’s not all doom.
- In its place, AI created jobs paying £100k: prompt engineers, AI ethicists, machine learning leads, and more.
- The winners? Those who pivot now and get skilled, while others wait it out.
Let’s not sugar-coat it: AI has already taken your job.
Or if it hasn’t yet, it’s circling. Patiently. Quietly.
But here’s the twist: AI isn’t just wiping out roles — it’s creating some of the most lucrative career paths we’ve ever seen. The catch? You’ll need to move faster than the machines do.
The headlines love a doomsday spin — robots stealing jobs, mass layoffs, the end of work. But if you read past the fear, you’ll spot a very different story: one where new six-figure jobs are exploding in demand.
And they’re not just for coders or people with PhDs in quantum linguistics. Many of these jobs value soft skills, writing, ethics, even common sense — just with a new AI twist.
So here’s your clear-eyed guide:
- 8 jobs that AI is quietly (or not-so-quietly) killing
- 15 roles growing faster than a ChatGPT thread on Reddit — and paying very, very well.
8 Jobs AI Is Already Eliminating (or Shrinking Fast)
1. Social Media Content Moderators
Remember the armies of humans reviewing TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook posts for nudity or hate speech? Well, they’re disappearing. TikTok now uses AI to catch 80% of violations before humans ever see them. It’s faster, tireless, and cheaper.
Most social platforms are following suit. The remaining humans deal with edge cases or trauma-heavy content no one wants to automate… but the bulk of the work is now machine-led.
2. Customer Service Representatives
You’ve chatted with a bot recently. So has everyone.
Klarna’s AI assistant replaced 700 human agents in one swoop. IKEA has quietly shifted call centre support to fully automated systems. These AI tools handle everything from order tracking to password resets.
The result? Companies save money. Customers get 24/7 responses. And entry-level service jobs vanish.
3. Telemarketers and Call Centre Agents
Outbound sales? It’s been digitised. AI voice systems now make thousands of simultaneous calls, shift tone mid-sentence, and even spot emotional cues. They never need a lunch break — and they’re hard to distinguish from a real person.
Companies now use humans to plan campaigns, but the actual calls? Fully automated. If your job was cold-calling, it’s time to reskill — fast.
4. Data Entry Clerks
Manual input is gone. OCR + AI means documents are scanned, sorted, and uploaded instantly. IBM has paused hiring for 7,800 back-office jobs as automation takes over.
Across insurance, banking, healthcare — companies that once hired data entry clerks by the dozen now need just a few to manage exceptions.
5. Retail Cashiers
Self-checkout kiosks were just the start. Amazon Go stores use computer vision to eliminate the checkout experience altogether — just grab and go.
Walmart and Tesco are rolling out similar models. Even mid-sized retailers are using AI to reduce cashier shifts by 10–25%. Humans now restock and assist — not scan.
6. Warehouse & Fulfilment Staff
Amazon’s warehouses are a case study in automation. Autonomous robots pick, pack, and ship faster than any human.
The result? Fewer injuries, more efficiency… and fewer humans.
Even smaller logistics firms are adopting warehouse AI, as costs drop and robots become “as-a-service”.
7. Translators & Content Writers (Basic-Level)
Generative AI is fast, multilingual, and on-brand. Duolingo replaced much of its content writing team with GPT-driven systems.
Marketing teams now use AI for product descriptions, blogs, and ads. Humans still do strategy — but the daily word count? AI’s job now.
8. Entry-Level Graphic Designers
AI tools like Midjourney, Ideogram, and Adobe Firefly generate visuals from a sentence. Logos, pitch decks, ad banners — all created in seconds. The entry-level designer who used to churn out social graphics? No longer essential.
Top-tier creatives still thrive. But production design? That’s already AI’s turf.
Are you futureproofed—or just hoping you’re not next?
15 AI-Driven Jobs Now Paying £100k+
Now for the exciting bit. While AI clears out repetitive roles, it also opens new high-paying jobs that didn’t exist 3 years ago.
These aren’t sci-fi ideas. These are real jobs being filled today — many in Singapore, Australia, India, and Korea — with salaries to match.
1. Machine Learning Engineer
The architects of AI itself. They build the algorithms powering everything from fraud detection to self-driving cars.
Salary: £85k–£210k
Needed: Python, TensorFlow/PyTorch, strong maths. Highly sought after across finance, healthcare, and Big Tech.
2. Data Scientist
Translates oceans of data into actual insights. Think Netflix recommendations, pricing strategies, or disease forecasting.
Salary: £70k–£160k
Key skills: Python, SQL, R, storytelling. A killer combo of tech + communication.
3. Prompt Engineer
No code needed — just words.
They craft the perfect prompts to steer AI models like ChatGPT toward accurate, helpful results.
Salary: £110k–£200k+
Writers, marketers, and linguists are all pivoting into this role. It’s exploding.
4. AI Product Manager
You don’t build the AI — you make it useful.
This role bridges business needs and tech teams to launch products that solve real problems.
Salary: £120k–£170k
Ideal for ex-consultants, startup leads, or technical PMs with an eye for product-market fit.
5. AI Ethics / Governance Specialist
Someone has to keep the machines honest. These specialists ensure AI is fair, safe, and compliant.
Salary: £100k–£170k
Perfect for lawyers, philosophers, or policy pros who understand AI’s social impact.
6. AI Compliance / Audit Specialist
GDPR. HIPAA. The EU AI Act.
These specialists check that AI systems follow legal rules and ethical standards.
Salary: £90k–£150k
Especially hot in finance, healthcare, and enterprise tech.
7. Data Engineer / MLOps Engineer
Behind every smart model is a ton of infrastructure.
Data Engineers build it. MLOps Engineers keep it running.
Salary: £90k–£140k
You’ll need DevOps, cloud computing, and Python chops.
8. AI Solutions Architect
The big-picture thinker. Designs AI systems that actually work at scale.
Salary: £110k–£160k
In demand in cloud, consulting, and enterprise IT.
9. Computer Vision Engineer
They teach machines to see.
From autonomous cars to medical scans to supermarket cameras — it’s all vision.
Salary: £120k+
Strong Python + OpenCV/TensorFlow is a must.
10. Robotics Engineer (AI + Machines)
Think factory bots, surgical arms, or drone fleets.
You’ll need both hardware knowledge and machine learning skills.
Salary: £100k–£150k+
A rare mix = big pay.
11. Autonomous Vehicle Engineer
Still one of AI’s toughest challenges — and best-paid verticals.
Salary: £120k+
Roles in perception, planning, and safety. Tesla, Waymo, and China’s Didi all hiring like mad.
12. AI Cybersecurity Specialist
Protect AI… with AI.
This job prevents attacks on models and builds AI-powered threat detection.
Salary: £120k+
Perfect for seasoned security pros looking to specialise.
13. Human–AI Interaction Designer (UX for AI)
Humans don’t trust what they don’t understand.
These designers make AI usable, friendly, and ethical.
Salary: £100k–£135k
Great path for UXers who want to go deep into AI systems.
14. LLM Trainer / Model Fine-tuner
You teach ChatGPT how to behave. Literally.
Using reinforcement learning, you align models with human values.
Salary: £100k–£180k
Ideal for teachers, researchers, or anyone great at structured thinking.
15. AI Consultant / Solutions Specialist
Advises companies on where and how to use AI.
Part analyst, part strategist, part translator.
Salary: £120k+
Management consultants and ex-founders thrive here.
The Bottom Line: You Don’t Need to Fear AI. You Need to Work With It.
If AI is your competition, you’re already behind. But if it’s your co-pilot, you’re ahead of 90% of the workforce.
This isn’t just about learning to code. It’s about learning to think differently.
To communicate with machines.
To spot where humans still matter — and amplify that with tech.
Because while AI might be killing off 8 jobs…
It’s creating 15 new ones that pay double — and need smart, curious, adaptable people.
So—
Will you let AI automate you… or will you get paid to run it?
You may also like:
AI Upskilling: Can Automation Boost Your Salary?
How Will AI Skills Impact Your Career and Salary in 2025?
Will AI Kill Your Marketing Job by 2030?
Author
Discover more from AIinASIA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Building local AI regulation from the ground up in Asia
OpenAI’s O3-Pro Model Sets New Standard For Reasoning and Reliability
The AI Black Box Problem: Why We Still Don’t Understand AI
-
Learning4 weeks agoHow to Use the “Create an Action” Feature in Custom GPTs
-
Learning4 weeks ago
How to Upload Knowledge into Your Custom GPT
-
Learning3 weeks ago
Build Your Own Custom GPT in Under 30 Minutes – Step-by-Step Beginner’s Guide
-
News4 days ago
Apple Intelligence 2025: New AI Leap Changes Everything
-
News1 day ago
OpenAI’s O3-Pro Model Sets New Standard For Reasoning and Reliability
-
Life2 days ago
The AI Black Box Problem: Why We Still Don’t Understand AI
-
Life1 week ago
How To Teach ChatGPT Your Writing Style
-
Life1 week ago
The Dirty Secret Behind Your Favourite AI Tools
