Life
The Mystery of ChatGPT’s Forbidden Names
Explore ChatGPT forbidden names and their impact on AI privacy.
Published
5 months agoon
By
AIinAsia
TL/DR:
- ChatGPT refuses to process certain names like “David Mayer” and “Jonathan Zittrain,” sparking curiosity and speculation among users.
- Potential reasons include privacy concerns, content moderation policies, and legal issues, highlighting the complex challenges AI companies face.
- Users have devised creative workarounds to test the AI’s limitations, turning the issue into a notable talking point in AI and tech communities.
ChatGPT has emerged as a powerful tool, captivating users with its ability to generate human-like text. Yet, the AI’s peculiar behaviour of refusing to process certain names has sparked intrigue and debate.
Names like “David Mayer,” “Jonathan Zittrain,” and “Jonathan Turley” trigger error responses or halt conversations, leaving users puzzled and curious.
This article delves into the mystery behind ChatGPT’s forbidden names, exploring potential reasons, user workarounds, and the broader implications for AI and privacy.
The Enigma of Forbidden Names
ChatGPT’s refusal to acknowledge specific names has become a hot topic in AI and tech communities. The names “David Mayer,” “Jonathan Zittrain,” and “Jonathan Turley” are among those that trigger error responses or abruptly end conversations. This behaviour has led to widespread speculation about the underlying reasons, with theories ranging from privacy concerns to content moderation policies.
The exact cause of these restrictions remains unclear, but they appear to be intentionally implemented. Some speculate that the restrictions are related to privacy protection measures, possibly due to the names’ association with real individuals. Others have suggested a connection to content moderation policies, highlighting the complex challenges AI companies face in balancing user freedom, privacy protection, and content moderation.
GDPR and Security Concerns
The peculiar behaviour of ChatGPT regarding forbidden names has sparked discussions about potential GDPR and security concerns. Some users have suggested that the restrictions might be related to privacy protection measures, possibly due to the names’ association with real individuals. Others have proposed a connection to content moderation policies, raising questions about how AI systems balance user freedom and privacy protection.
“The incident highlights the complex challenges AI companies face in balancing user freedom, privacy protection, and content moderation.”
This situation underscores the need for transparency in AI systems, especially as they become more integrated into daily life and subject to regulations like GDPR. As AI continues to evolve, it is crucial for companies to address these concerns and ensure that their systems are both effective and ethical.
User Workaround Attempts
In response to ChatGPT’s refusal to acknowledge certain names, users have devised various creative workarounds to test the AI’s limitations. Some have tried inserting spaces between the words, claiming the name as their own, or presenting it as part of a riddle. Others have attempted to use phonetic spellings, alternative languages, or even ASCII art to represent the name. Despite these ingenious efforts, ChatGPT consistently fails to process or respond to prompts containing the forbidden names, often resulting in error messages or conversation termination.
The persistent attempts by users to circumvent this restriction have not only highlighted the AI’s unwavering stance on the matter but have also fuelled online discussions and theories about the underlying reasons for this peculiar behaviour. This phenomenon has sparked a mix of frustration, curiosity, and amusement among ChatGPT users, turning the issue of forbidden names into a notable talking point in AI and tech communities.
ChatGPT-Specific Behaviour
ChatGPT’s refusal to acknowledge certain names appears to be a unique phenomenon specific to this AI model. When users input the forbidden names, ChatGPT either crashes, returns error codes, or abruptly ends the conversation. This behaviour persists across various attempts to circumvent the restriction, including creative methods like using spaces between words or claiming it as one’s own name. Interestingly, this issue seems exclusive to ChatGPT, as other AI language models and search engines do not exhibit similar limitations when presented with the same names.
The peculiarity of this situation has led to widespread speculation and experimentation among users. Some have humorously suggested that the forbidden names might be associated with a resistance movement against future AI dominance, while others have proposed more serious theories related to privacy concerns or content moderation policies. Despite the numerous attempts to uncover the reason behind this behaviour, OpenAI has not provided an official explanation, leaving the true cause of this ChatGPT-specific quirk shrouded in mystery.
The List of Forbidden Names
Several names have been identified as triggering error responses or causing ChatGPT to halt when mentioned. These include:
- Brian Hood: An Australian mayor who previously threatened to sue OpenAI for defamation over false statements generated about him.
- Jonathan Turley: A law professor and Fox News commentator who claimed ChatGPT generated false information about him.
- Jonathan Zittrain: A Harvard law professor who has expressed concerns about AI risks.
- David Faber: A CNBC journalist, though the reason for his inclusion is unclear.
- Guido Scorza: An Italian data protection expert who wrote about using GDPR’s “right to be forgotten” to delete ChatGPT data on himself.
- Michael Hayden: Included in the list, though the reason is not specified.
- Nick Bosa: Mentioned as a banned name, but no explanation is provided.
- Daniel Lubetzky: Also listed without a clear reason for the restriction.
These restrictions appear to be implemented through hard-coded filters, possibly to avoid legal issues, protect privacy, or prevent the spread of misinformation. The exact reasons for each name’s inclusion are not always clear, and OpenAI has not provided official explanations for most cases.
Unlocking the Mystery
The dynamic nature of these restrictions highlights the ongoing challenges in balancing AI functionality with legal, ethical, and privacy concerns. As AI continues to evolve, it is crucial for companies to address these concerns and ensure that their systems are both effective and ethical. The mystery of ChatGPT’s forbidden names serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in developing and deploying AI technologies.
Final Thoughts: The AI Conundrum
The enigma of ChatGPT’s forbidden names underscores the intricate balance between innovation and regulation in the AI landscape. As we continue to explore the capabilities and limitations of AI, it is essential to foster transparency, ethical considerations, and user engagement. The curiosity and creativity sparked by this mystery highlight the importance of ongoing dialogue and collaboration in shaping the future of AI.
Join the Conversation:
What are your thoughts on ChatGPT’s forbidden names? Have you encountered any other peculiar behaviours in AI systems? Share your experiences and join the conversation below.
Don’t forget to subscribe for updates on AI and AGI developments and comment on the article in the section below. Subscribe here. We’d love to hear your insights and engage with our community of tech enthusiasts!
You may also like:
- Training ChatGPT to Mimic Your Unique Voice
- The AI Chip Race: US Plans New Restrictions on China’s Tech Access
- European AI Advancements Halted: Meta’s Data Dilemma
- Try the free version of ChatGPT by tapping here.
Author
Discover more from AIinASIA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
You may like
-
Build Your Own Agentic AI — No Coding Required
-
OpenAI’s New ChatGPT Image Policy: Is AI Moderation Becoming Too Lax?
-
Unearthly Tech? AI’s Bizarre Chip Design Leaves Experts Flummoxed
-
How Did Meta’s AI Achieve 80% Mind-Reading Accuracy?
-
How to Prepare for AI’s Impact on Your Job by 2030
-
We (Sort Of) Missed the Mark with Digital Transformation
Life
Whose English Is Your AI Speaking?
AI tools default to mainstream American English, excluding global voices. Why it matters and what inclusive language design could look like.
Published
1 day agoon
May 10, 2025By
AIinAsia
TL;DR — What You Need To Know
- Most AI tools are trained on mainstream American English, ignoring global Englishes like Singlish or Indian English
- This leads to bias, miscommunication, and exclusion in real-world applications
- To fix it, we need AI that recognises linguistic diversity—not corrects it.
English Bias In AI
Here’s a fun fact that’s not so fun when you think about it: 90% of generative AI training data is in English. But not just any English. Not Nigerian English. Not Indian English. Not the English you’d hear in Singapore’s hawker centres or on the streets of Liverpool. Nope. It’s mostly good ol’ mainstream American English.
That’s the voice most AI systems have learned to mimic, model, and prioritise. Not because it’s better. But because that’s what’s been fed into the system.
So what happens when you build global technology on a single, dominant dialect?
A Monolingual Machine in a Multilingual World
Let’s be clear: English isn’t one language. It’s many. About 1.5 billion people speak it, and almost all of them do so with their own twist. Grammar, vocabulary, intonation, slang—it all varies.
But when your AI tools—from autocorrect to resume scanners—are only trained on one flavour of English (mostly US-centric, polished, white-collar English), a lot of other voices start to disappear. And not quietly.
Speakers of regional or “non-standard” English often find their words flagged as incorrect, their accents ignored, or their syntax marked as a mistake. And that’s not just inconvenient—it’s exclusionary.
Why Mainstream American English Took Over
This dominance didn’t happen by chance. It’s historical, economic, and deeply structural.
The internet was largely developed in the US. Big Tech? Still mostly based there. The datasets used to train AI? Scraped from web content dominated by American media, forums, and publishing.
So, whether you’re chatting with a voice assistant or asking ChatGPT to write your email, what you’re hearing back is often a polished, neutral-sounding, corporate-friendly version of American English. The kind that gets labelled “standard” by systems that were never trained to value anything else.
When AI Gets It Wrong—And Who Pays the Price
Let’s play this out in real life.
- An AI tutor can’t parse a Nigerian English question? The student loses confidence.
- A resume written in Indian English gets rejected by an automated scanner? The applicant misses out.
- Voice transcription software mangles an Australian First Nations story? Cultural heritage gets distorted.
These aren’t small glitches. They’re big failures with real-world consequences. And they’re happening as AI tools are rolled out everywhere—into schools, offices, government services, and creative workspaces.
It’s “Englishes”, Plural
If you’ve grown up being told your English was “wrong,” here’s your reminder: It’s not.
Singlish? Not broken. Just brilliant. Indian English? Full of expressive, efficient, and clever turns of phrase. Aboriginal English? Entirely valid, with its own rules and rich oral traditions.
Language is fluid, social, and fiercely local. And every community that’s been handed English has reshaped it, stretched it, owned it.
But many AI systems still treat these variations as noise. Not worth training on. Not important enough to include in benchmarks. Not profitable to prioritise. So they get left out—and with them, so do their speakers.
Towards Linguistic Justice in AI
Fixing this doesn’t mean rewriting everyone’s grammar. It means rewriting the technology.
We need to stop asking AI to uphold one “correct” form of English, and start asking it to understand the many. That takes:
- More inclusive training data – built on diverse voices, not just dominant ones
- Cross-disciplinary collaboration – between linguists, engineers, educators, and community leaders
- Respect for language rights – including the choice not to digitise certain cultural knowledge
- A mindset shift – from standardising language to supporting expression
Because the goal isn’t to “correct” the speaker. It’s to make the system smarter, fairer, and more reflective of the world it serves.
Ask Yourself: Whose English Is It Anyway?
Next time your AI assistant “fixes” your sentence or flags your phrasing, take a second to pause. Ask: whose English is this system trying to emulate? And more importantly, whose English is it leaving behind?
Language has always been a site of power—but also of play, resistance, and identity. The way forward for AI isn’t more uniformity. It’s more Englishes, embraced on their own terms.
You may also like:
- How Singtel Used AI to Bring Generations Together for Singapore’s SG60
- Revolutionising Workspaces: The Surge of AI and ChatGPT in Indian Companies
- Or try out the free version of Claude AI by tapping here.
Author
Discover more from AIinASIA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Business
Build Your Own Agentic AI — No Coding Required
Want to build a smart AI agent without coding? Here’s how to use ChatGPT and no-code tools to create your own agentic AI — step by step.
Published
2 days agoon
May 9, 2025By
AIinAsia
TL;DR — What You Need to Know About Agentic AI
- Anyone can now build a powerful AI agent using ChatGPT — no technical skills needed.
- Tools like Custom GPTs and Make.com make it easy to create agents that do more than chat — they take action.
- The key is to start with a clear purpose, test it in real-world conditions, and expand as your needs grow.
Anyone Can Build One — And That Includes You
Not too long ago, building a truly capable AI agent felt like something only Silicon Valley engineers could pull off. But the landscape has changed. You don’t need a background in programming or data science anymore — you just need a clear idea of what you want your AI to do, and access to a few easy-to-use tools.
Whether you’re a startup founder looking to automate support, a marketer wanting to build a digital assistant, or simply someone curious about AI, creating your own agent is now well within reach.
What Does ‘Agentic’ Mean, Exactly?
Think of an agentic AI as something far more capable than a standard chatbot. It’s an AI that doesn’t just reply to questions — it can actually do things. That might mean sending emails, pulling information from the web, updating spreadsheets, or interacting with third-party tools and systems.
The difference lies in autonomy. A typical chatbot might respond with a script or FAQ-style answer. An agentic AI, on the other hand, understands the user’s intent, takes appropriate action, and adapts based on ongoing feedback and instructions. It behaves more like a digital team member than a digital toy.
Step 1: Define What You Want It to Do
Before you dive into building anything, it’s important to get crystal clear on what role your agent will play.
Ask yourself:
- Who is going to use this agent?
- What specific tasks should it be responsible for?
- Are there repetitive processes it can take off your plate?
For instance, if you run an online business, you might want an agent that handles frequently asked questions, helps users track their orders, and flags complex queries for human follow-up. If you’re in consulting, your agent could be designed to book meetings, answer basic service questions, or even pre-qualify leads.
Be practical. Focus on solving one or two real problems. You can always expand its capabilities later.
Step 2: Pick a No-Code Platform to Build On
Now comes the fun part: choosing the right platform. If you’re new to this, I recommend starting with OpenAI’s Custom GPTs — it’s the most accessible option and designed for non-coders.
Custom GPTs allow you to build your own version of ChatGPT by simply describing what you want it to do. No technical setup required. You’ll need a ChatGPT Plus or Team subscription to access this feature, but once inside, the process is remarkably straightforward.
If you’re aiming for more complex automation — such as integrating your agent with email systems, customer databases, or CRMs — you may want to explore other no-code platforms like Make.com (formerly Integromat), Dialogflow, or Bubble.io. These offer visual builders where you can map out flows, connect apps, and define logic — all without needing to write a single line of code.
Step 3: Use ChatGPT’s Custom GPT Builder
Let’s say you’ve opted for the Custom GPT route — here’s how to get started.
First, log in to your ChatGPT account and select “Explore GPTs” from the sidebar. Click on “Create,” and you’ll be prompted to describe your agent in natural language. That’s it — just describe what the agent should do, how it should behave, and what tone it should take. For example:
“You are a friendly and professional assistant for my online skincare shop. You help customers with questions about product ingredients, delivery options, and how to track their order status.”
Once you’ve set the description, you can go further by uploading reference materials such as product catalogues, FAQs, or policies. These will give your agent deeper knowledge to draw from. You can also choose to enable additional tools like web browsing or code interpretation, depending on your needs.
Then, test it. Interact with your agent just like a customer would. If it stumbles, refine your instructions. Think of it like coaching — the more clearly you guide it, the better the output becomes.
Step 4: Go Further with Visual Builders
If you’re looking to connect your agent to the outside world — such as pulling data from a spreadsheet, triggering a workflow in your CRM, or sending a Slack message — that’s where tools like Make.com come in.
These platforms allow you to visually design workflows by dragging and dropping different actions and services into a flowchart-style builder. You can set up scenarios like:
- A user asks the agent, “Where’s my order?”
- The agent extracts key info (e.g. email or order number)
- It looks up the order via an API or database
- It responds with the latest shipping status, all in real time
The experience feels a bit like setting up rules in Zapier, but with more control over logic and branching paths. These platforms open up serious possibilities without requiring a developer on your team.
Step 5: Train It, Test It, Then Launch
Once your agent is built, don’t stop there. Test it with real people — ideally your target users. Watch how they interact with it. Are there questions it can’t answer? Instructions it misinterprets? Fix those, and iterate as you go.
Training doesn’t mean coding — it just means improving the agent’s understanding and behaviour by updating your descriptions, feeding it more examples, or adjusting its structure in the visual builder.
Over time, your agent will become more capable, confident, and useful. Think of it as a digital intern that never sleeps — but needs a bit of initial training to perform well.
Why Build One?
The most obvious reason is time. An AI agent can handle repetitive questions, assist users around the clock, and reduce the strain on your support or operations team.
But there’s also the strategic edge. As more companies move towards automation and AI-led support, offering a smart, responsive agent isn’t just a nice-to-have — it’s quickly becoming an expectation.
And here’s the kicker: you don’t need a big team or budget to get started. You just need clarity, curiosity, and a bit of time to explore.
Where to Begin
If you’ve got a ChatGPT Plus account, start by building a Custom GPT. You’ll get an immediate sense of what’s possible. Then, if you need more, look at integrating Make.com or another builder that fits your workflow.
The world of agentic AI is no longer reserved for the technically gifted. It’s now open to creators, business owners, educators, and anyone else with a problem to solve and a bit of imagination.
What kind of AI agent would you build — and what would you have it do for you first? Let us know in the comments below!
You may also like:
- How To Start Using AI Agents To Transform Your Business
- Revolution Ahead: Microsoft’s AI Agents Set to Transform Asian Workplaces
- AI Chatbots: 10 Best ChatGPTs in the ChatGPT Store
- Or tap here to try this out now at ChatGPT by tapping here.
Author
Discover more from AIinASIA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Life
Which ChatGPT Model Should You Choose?
Confused about the ChatGPT model options? This guide clarifies how to choose the right model for your tasks.
Published
3 days agoon
May 9, 2025By
AIinAsia
TL;DR — What You Need to Know:
- GPT-4o is ideal for summarising, brainstorming, and real-time data analysis, with multimodal capabilities.
- GPT-4.5 is the go-to for creativity, emotional intelligence, and communication-based tasks.
- o4-mini is designed for speed and technical queries, while o4-mini-high excels at detailed tasks like advanced coding and scientific explanations.
Navigating the Maze of ChatGPT Models
OpenAI’s ChatGPT has come a long way, but its multitude of models has left many users scratching their heads. If you’re still confused about which version of ChatGPT to use for what task, you’re not alone! Luckily, OpenAI has stepped in with a handy guide that outlines when to choose one model over another. Whether you’re an enterprise user or just getting started, this breakdown will help you make sense of the options at your fingertips.
So, Which ChatGPT Model Makes Sense For You?
Currently, ChatGPT offers five models, each suited to different tasks. They are:
- GPT-4o – the “omni model”
- GPT-4.5 – the creative powerhouse
- o4-mini – the speedster for technical tasks
- o4-mini-high – the heavy lifter for detailed work
- o3 – the analytical thinker for complex, multi-step problems
Which model should you use?
Here’s what OpenAI has to say:
- GPT-4o: If you’re looking for a reliable all-rounder, this is your best bet. It’s perfect for tasks like summarising long texts, brainstorming emails, or generating content on the fly. With its multimodal features, it supports text, images, audio, and even advanced data analysis.
- GPT-4.5: If creativity is your priority, then GPT-4.5 is your go-to. This version shines with emotional intelligence and excels in communication-based tasks. Whether you’re crafting engaging narratives or brainstorming innovative ideas, GPT-4.5 brings a more human-like touch.
- o4-mini: For those in need of speed and precision, o4-mini is the way to go. It handles technical queries like STEM problems and programming tasks swiftly, making it a strong contender for quick problem-solving.
- o4-mini-high: If you’re dealing with intricate, detailed tasks like advanced coding or complex mathematical equations, o4-mini-high delivers the extra horsepower you need. It’s designed for accuracy and higher-level technical work.
- o3: When the task requires multi-step reasoning or strategic planning, o3 is the model you want. It’s designed for deep analysis, complex coding, and problem-solving across multiple stages.
Which one should you pick?
For $20/month with ChatGPT Plus, you’ll have access to all these models and can easily switch between them depending on your task.
But here’s the big question: Which model are you most likely to use? Could OpenAI’s new model options finally streamline your workflow, or will you still be bouncing between versions? Let me know your thoughts!
You may also like:
- What is ChatGPT Plus?
- ChatGPT Plus and Copilot Pro – both powered by OpenAI – which is right for you?
- Or try the free ChatGPT models by tapping here.
Author
Discover more from AIinASIA
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Whose English Is Your AI Speaking?

Edit AI Images on the Go with Gemini’s New Update

Build Your Own Agentic AI — No Coding Required
Trending
-
Marketing2 weeks ago
Playbook: How to Use Ideogram.ai (no design skills required!)
-
Life2 weeks ago
WhatsApp Confirms How To Block Meta AI From Your Chats
-
Business2 weeks ago
ChatGPT Just Quietly Released “Memory with Search” – Here’s What You Need to Know
-
Life7 days ago
Geoffrey Hinton’s AI Wake-Up Call — Are We Raising a Killer Cub?
-
Life5 days ago
Too Nice for Comfort? Why OpenAI Rolled Back GPT-4o’s Sycophantic Personality Update
-
Business6 days ago
OpenAI Faces Legal Heat Over Profit Plans — Are We Watching a Moral Meltdown?
-
Life1 week ago
AI Just Slid Into Your DMs: ChatGPT and Perplexity Are Now on WhatsApp
-
Life4 days ago
Why ChatGPT Turned Into a Grovelling Sycophant — And What OpenAI Got Wrong