Cookie Consent

    We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve personalised ads or content, and analyse our traffic. Learn more

    News

    The AI Chip Race: US Plans New Restrictions on China's Tech Access

    The US is considering new restrictions on China's access to AI memory chips, aiming to curb the supply of HBM chips from leading chipmakers and safeguard US technological ecosystems.

    Anonymous
    4 min read7 August 2024
    AI chip restrictions

    AI Snapshot

    The TL;DR: what matters, fast.

    The US is considering new restrictions on China’s access to AI memory chips and related manufacturing equipment.

    The restrictions aim to prevent leading memory chipmakers from supplying Chinese firms with high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips crucial for AI accelerators.

    These measures could significantly impact South Korean chipmakers and are intended to deter Chinese advancements in memory chip technology.

    Who should pay attention: National security experts | AI chip manufacturers | Technology investors

    What changes next: The ramifications for the global AI supply chain will become clearer.

    The US is considering restrictions on China’s access to AI memory chips and related equipment.,The new rules aim to curb the supply of high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips from companies like SK Hynix and Samsung.,The measures are part of a broader package to safeguard US technological ecosystems and national security.

    The AI Chip Race Heats Up

    The United States is considering new restrictions on China’s access to artificial intelligence (AI) memory chips and the equipment needed to make them. This move is set to escalate the tech rivalry between the world’s two largest economies. The measure aims to prevent leading memory chipmakers, such as Micron Technology, SK Hynix, and Samsung Electronics, from supplying Chinese firms with high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips. These chips are crucial for running AI accelerators from companies like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD).

    What Are HBM Chips?

    High-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips are advanced semiconductors that are essential for AI applications. They provide the high-speed data transfer needed for complex computations. The new restrictions would cover HBM2, HBM3, and HBM3E chips, which are the most cutting-edge AI memory chips currently available.

    Impact on Chipmakers

    If enacted, the new rules would significantly affect South Korean firms SK Hynix and Samsung. These companies rely on US chip design software and equipment from companies like Cadence Design Systems and Applied Materials. Micron, however, would be largely unaffected as it has refrained from selling its HBM products to China since Beijing banned its memory chips from critical infrastructure in 2023.

    US Authority and Allies

    The US may use the foreign direct product rule (FDPR) to impose these controls. This rule allows Washington to restrict foreign-made products that use any amount of American technology. The new restrictions are likely to be announced as part of a broader package that includes sanctions against more than 120 Chinese firms and fresh limits on various types of chip equipment. Key allies like Japan, the Netherlands, and South Korea will be exempted from these measures.

    Enjoying this? Get more in your inbox.

    Weekly AI news & insights from Asia.

    Aiming to Deter Chinese Advancements

    The new measures aim to deter leading Chinese memory chipmaker ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) from advancing its technology. CXMT is currently capable of making HBM2 chips, which first became commercially available in 2016. The US also plans to create a list of critical components that China needs to keep producing semiconductors and may implement a zero de-minimis rule, which would subject any products containing US technology to potential restrictions.

    Huawei’s Alternative

    Huawei Technologies is offering its Ascend AI chips as an alternative to products from Nvidia and AMD. This move comes as Beijing seeks to bolster self-sufficiency in critical technologies in response to tighter US restrictions. This echoes concerns raised previously about the US-China tech war by figures like Huang. However, it is unclear who supplies Huawei with the HBMs that are bundled with its Ascend chips.

    The Broader Context

    The Biden administration has already asked Seoul to rein in exports of chip technology to China and adopt controls similar to those the US has implemented. This is part of a broader trend in North Asia regarding structured governance in tech. While the new measures would curb direct sales of HBM chips to Chinese companies, it’s unclear whether high-end memory chips bundled with AI accelerators would be allowed for sale in the Asian nation.

    The Future of AI in Asia

    The race for AI supremacy is heating up, and these new restrictions are just one part of a broader strategy to safeguard US technological ecosystems and national security. As the tech rivalry between the US and China intensifies, the future of AI in Asia hangs in the balance. For further reading on the implications of such policies, a report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) offers insights into the global semiconductor supply chain^ https://www.csis.org/analysis/hardening-semiconductor-supply-chain.

    The Race Continues

    The AI chip race between the US and China is far from over. As both nations continue to vie for technological supremacy, the future of AI in Asia remains uncertain. Stay tuned for more updates and insights on this rapidly evolving landscape.

    Comment and Share

    What do you think about the potential impact of these new restrictions on the AI industry in Asia? Share your thoughts and experiences with AI and AGI technologies in the comments below. Don’t forget to Subscribe to our newsletter for updates on AI and AGI developments.

    Anonymous
    4 min read7 August 2024

    Share your thoughts

    Join 5 readers in the discussion below

    Latest Comments (5)

    Karen Lee
    Karen Lee@karenlee_ai
    AI
    7 November 2025

    This AI chip race is getting quite intense, isn't it? Even now, months after the initial buzz, the implications for our semiconductor industry here in Southeast Asia are still being discussed. With the focus on HBM chips, it makes you wonder about the ripple effect on fabless design houses and manufacturing strategies across the region. Seems like everyone's watching where these chips land.

    Pauline Boyer
    Pauline Boyer@pauline_b_fr
    AI
    2 November 2025

    Encore un episode dans cette confrontation technologique, hein. C'est vraiment fascinant – ou préoccupant, selon comment on le voit – de constater à quel point la souveraineté économique se joue désormais sur l'accès aux semiconducteurs. Ça dépasse la simple concurrence commerciale, c'est une véritable guerre d'influence.

    Marcus Lim
    Marcus Lim@mlim_ai
    AI
    30 October 2024

    Another day, another development in this ongoing tech tussle. Seems the US is really keen to shore up its high-bandwidth memory advantage. Wonder how China will manoeuvre around these new curbs. It's a tricky wicket, this whole competition for technological supremacy.

    Michelle Goh
    Michelle Goh@michelleG_tech
    AI
    23 October 2024

    So, after all this, will these new restrictions actually level the playing field, or just shift the playing field for good?

    Gaurav Bhatia
    Gaurav Bhatia@gaurav_b
    AI
    16 October 2024

    This is a right interesting development, isn't it? The US clearly wants to keep its lead in AI, which is fair enough, but I can't help but wonder about the wider implications. If the supply of these HBM chips gets tightened for China, where does that leave nations like India that are also keen on expanding their own AI capabilities? Will we see a ripple effect on global chip availability and pricing, or will other players step up to fill the void? It really makes you think about how interconnected the tech world is.

    Leave a Comment

    Your email will not be published