White-collar work in Asia may soon face one of its most profound shake-ups; but whether AI will devastate careers or simply redefine them is far from settled.
AI’s reach into white-collar work is growing quickly, particularly in coding, finance, and professional services.,Evidence of disruption is mounting including tougher job markets for STEM graduates and AI’s uptake in startup development.,The pace of AI adoption is unprecedented, accelerated by models that can reason, self-correct, and deploy software with minimal human intervention.
For months, headlines have been splashed with doom-laden predictions from the world’s boardrooms. The chief executives of Ford and J.P. Morgan Chase have publicly warned that swathes of white-collar jobs could vanish. Over in Silicon Valley, figures at Amazon, Meta and OpenAI admit that a new wave of agentic AI is advancing towards the workplace faster than even they had wagered.
Dario Amodei, chief executive of Anthropic, has been especially blunt, forecasting that nearly half of entry-level roles in finance, law, consulting and tech could be replaced or eliminated outright.
But Christopher Stanton, Harvard Business School’s Marvin Bower Associate Professor of Business Administration, offers a cooler take. “It’s too early to tell,” he says, arguing that the range of AI’s possible impacts stretches from modest disruption to wholesale transformation and that both extremes have early evidence in their favour.
White-Collar Work Meets Agentic AI
The AI encroachment is no longer hypothetical. Stanton points to data showing that around 35% of the tasks in white-collar roles overlap with AI’s current capabilities. In optimistic scenarios, this automation frees up human workers for more creative or complex activities. In pessimistic ones, it accelerates redundancy.
He notes one telling shift: “Computer-science and STEM graduates are having more trouble finding jobs than in the past,” partly because AI tools now write large chunks of code once assigned to junior engineers. Startup incubators such as Y Combinator are reporting that AI is producing the first lines of code for many new ventures; a scenario almost unthinkable five years ago.
The Three Forces Driving Rapid AI Uptake
Enjoying this? Get more in your inbox.
Weekly AI news & insights from Asia.
- Unprecedented speed of diffusion
- Chain-of-thought reasoning
- Low-barrier software creation
Which Jobs Could Change First?
Coding is the most obvious early target, but it’s far from alone. Knowledge work across the board from legal research to financial modelling is open to disruption. Yet Stanton cautions against the kind of sweeping predictions made in the late 2010s, when many expected radiologists to be replaced. Instead, they are busier than ever, aided by AI tools and benefiting from lower imaging costs.
In some industries, AI may expand the scope of work rather than shrink it. If automation lowers costs and enables new services, demand for human oversight and creative problem-solving could actually grow.
Wages, Inequality, and the AI Divide
Not all impacts will be about job loss. In some rollouts, AI has been shown to lift lower-performing workers by filling knowledge gaps in real time. This could help narrow wage inequality in certain sectors, particularly in customer service and call centres. Yet other scenarios are less sunny, with automation potentially eroding wages for mid-tier professionals whose work is most easily replicated.
Policymakers Face an Impossible Early Game
Governments, especially across Asia’s diverse economies, may find it difficult to shape AI’s trajectory in advance. Stanton’s view is stark: without subsidies or tax policy, interventions will struggle to compete with leaner, AI-enabled rivals. More likely, safety nets and retraining programmes will be rolled out after the fact, a reactive posture that risks leaving many workers exposed.
In the meantime, leaders in business and policy face a strategic challenge: to anticipate which skills will remain valuable and to invest in them early, before AI’s curve outpaces their ability to respond.
As AI gains fluency in the office as well as the factory, the question isn’t simply “Will my job survive?” but “What will my job become?” Asia’s corporate and policy leaders will need to decide whether they’re preparing for a storm or a season of reinvention. You can find more insights on the future of work and AI's impact in articles like AI's Secret Revolution: Trends You Can't Miss and in reports like the World Economic Forum's "Future of Jobs Report" which highlights evolving job landscapes due to technological advancements Future of Jobs Report.
Latest Comments (3)
This article really hits home, especially here in the Philippines. I see so many discussions, even amongst my colleagues in operations, about how AI is going to reshape our roles. The "mixed forecasts" bit is spot on; some see opportunity, others are just plain worried about their jobs. It's a proper wake-up call for us to upskill, or be left behind, eh?
Excellent overview, really gets the ol' grey matter working. It's spot on about the rapid uptake, we're seeing it everywhere from our CBD offices to the smaller firms. However, I'm a bit dubious about the "mixed forecasts" for employment. While the article touches on skilling up, it feels a tad optimistic about how smoothly that transition will be for everyone. The pace of change, especially with generative AI, is rather breathtaking. Are we truly prepared to reskill a substantial portion of the workforce quickly enough, or will there be a significant lag, leaving many in a lurch? Just a thought from sunny Singapore.
This piece really hits home. I’ve been hearing a lot of chatter among my colleagues about how AI will affect our careers, especially for us office workers here in Singapore. It’s not just a Western phenomenon; the *kiasu* mentality to adopt new tech is real, but the job security question remains a huge uncertainty. It's a proper concern.
Leave a Comment